add-memberalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbellblockcalendarcamerachatchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-upcircle-with-crosscomposecrossfacebookflagfolderglobegoogleimagesinstagramkeylocation-pinmedalmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1pagepersonpluspollsImported LayersImported LayersImported LayersshieldstartwitterwinbackClosewinbackCompletewinbackDiscountyahoo

Re: [newtech-1] statistical breakdown of the collected website defacements from the last few years

From: Asif Y.
Sent on: Sunday, March 16, 2008 2:11 PM
On Mar 16, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Victor Shamanovsky wrote:

> Those numbers show us that LAMP stack is more difficult to work  
> with for
> various reasons. It is more costly because of that, and in addition  
> raw
> numbers indicate that it is getting hacked more.

Sounds more like PHP being insecure and/or hard to secure.

If you want to make this something about .NET and other development  
platforms, you may have a point.

However, the OS argument here is irrelevant. Most of these servers  
are running PHP, and it's not as if IIS is invincible either.

Sadly enough, I'm developing a PHP app right now, but thankfully I  
have a Perl/C background, and can see security holes (fairly) easily.

.NET like any type of managed code (Java, Ruby, Lisp, etc.) is  
inherently safer for the server -- but the app can still be cracked  
(obviously, nothing is perfect).

This article is a red herring, since they are not drawing a  
difference between the OS that the server is running and the apps  
that the server is running.

It's really not even worth talking about.


Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy