
What we’re about
The Chicago Philosophy Meetup is a community of groups created by and for people interested in engagements with philosophy and the history of such engagements. Our members have a wide variety of backgrounds besides philosophy, including literature, law, physics, theology, music, and more.
We host events suggested by individual members and coordinated by volunteer organizers and offer opportunities for discussion with others who share these interests. If you have an idea for a topic you'd like to discuss, especially if you are from an historically underrepresented group in academic philosophy, let us work with you to make it happen.
Whether you're new to philosophy and looking to get started, or have been doing philosophy for some time and want to dig a bit deeper, we invite you to check us out.
We have basic expectations for how we talk to each other, so:
DO...
Listen to others
Ask for clarification
Get to know people
Help other voices to be heard
Work towards understanding each other
Practice moving past your assumptions about others
DON'T...
Limit others’ performance of items on the DO list
The Chicago Philosophy Meetup opposes any force of exclusion, discrimination, and/or harassment present in its community. Such forces include, but are not limited to, racism, transphobia, misogyny, and antisemitism. The Chicago Philosophy Meetup seeks to be inclusive because only in this way can we fulfill the DOs list above. We are here to help! If you have concerns, questions about a meeting, or need assistance (e.g. accessibility), please contact either the organizers or the event host for the meeting directly.
"Philosophy is not a theory but an activity."
-- from "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus," Wittgenstein
Discourse cheers us to companionable
reflection. Such reflection neither
parades polemical opinions nor does it
tolerate complaisant agreement. The sail
of thinking keeps trimmed hard to the
wind of the matter.
-- from "On the Experience of Thinking," Heidegger
Check out our calendar
Upcoming events (4+)
See all- Aristotle's On Interpretation - Live-Reading--European StyleLink visible for attendees
July 22 - We are going to read chapter 14, the last of *On Interpretation*. I tentatively entitle it (because Aristotle doesn't have a title for it) "Knowing the Knowable through Belief." That is, up until now, Aristotle has been focusing on the relationship between our knowing and the things that are. Now, in the final chapter, he turns his attention toward the relationship between our knowing and the beliefs we craft so as to lasso-grasp the things that are. The bookmark is set at Bekker line 23a27. George will do the initial read-through.
.
Join the meeting and participate.
.
------
.
Organon means "instrument," as in, instrument for thought and speech. The term was given by ancient commentators to a group of Aristotle's treatises comprising his logical works.Organon
|-- Categories ---- 2023.02.28
|-- On Interpretation ---- 2023.12.12
|-- Topics
|-- On Sophistical Refutations
|-- Rhetoric*
|-- Prior Analytics
|-- Posterior Analytics(* Robin Smith, author of SEP's 2022 entry "Aristotle's Logic," argues that Rhetoric should be part of the Organon.)
Whenever we do any human thing, we can either do it well or do it poorly. With instruments, we can do things either better, faster, and more; or worse, slower, and less. That is, with instruments they either augment or diminish our doings.
Do thinking and speaking (and writing and listening) require instruments? Yes. We need physical instruments like microphones, megaphones, pens, papers, computers. But we also need mental instruments: grammar, vocabulary words, evidence-gathering techniques, big-picture integration methods, persuasion strategies. Thinking while sitting meditatively all day in a lotus position doesn't require much instrumentation of any kind, but thinking and speaking well in the sense of project-planning, problem-solving, negotiating, arguing, deliberating--that is, the active engagements in the world (whether romantic, social, commercial, or political)--do require well-honed mental instruments. That's the Organon in a nutshell.
Are you an up-and-coming human being, a doer, go-getter, achiever, or at least you're choosing to become one? You need to wield the Organon.
Join us.
- Kant: Critique of Practical Reason (Week 4)Link visible for attendees
Meeting link: https://meet.jit.si/CPM-Kant-Wednesdays
Our Kant reading continues with the Critique of Practical Reason. We'll be covering Book II (Dialectic)
pp 226 - 258 (Gregor, Cambridge Practical Philosophy)
pp 137 - 186 (Pluhar)
pp 5:107 - 148 (Complete Works)Note: Meetings focus on developing a common language and friendship through studying Kant. The host will provide an interpretation of Kant; other interpretations will not be discussed until later in the meeting. Additional interpretations, topics, and questions can be addressed through the Jitsi chat feature.
No prior experience with Kant is necessary.
Reading Schedule:
Week 1:
Preface and Introduction
pp 139 - 149 (Gregor, Cambridge Practical Philosophy)
pp 3 - 25 (Pluhar)
pp 5:3 - 16 (Complete Works)Week 2:
Book I (Analytic) - Chapter I
pp 153 - 186 (Gregor, Cambridge Practical Philosophy)
pp 29 - 77 (Pluhar)
pp 5:19 - 57 (Complete Works)Week 3:
Book I (Analytic) - Chapters II and III
pp 186 - 225 (Gregor, Cambridge Practical Philosophy)
pp 77 - 135 (Pluhar)
pp 5:57 - 106 (Complete Works)Week 4:
Book II (Dialectic)
pp 226 - 258 (Gregor, Cambridge Practical Philosophy)
pp 137 - 186 (Pluhar)
pp 5:107 - 148 (Complete Works)Week 5:
Doctrine of Method
pp 261 - 271 (Gregor, Cambridge Practical Philosophy)
pp 189 - 205 (Pluhar)
pp 5:151 - 163 (Complete Works)There are numerous editions (and free translations available online if you search), but this collection contains all of Kant's Practical Philosophy in translation:
- Kant FTΦ: Eco's Interpretation and Overinterpretation (Live Reading)Link visible for attendees
Meeting link: https://meet.jit.si/CPM-Kant-Wednesdays
We'll be continuing our reading from the beginning of lecture 2, "Overinterpreting texts", on page 45.
Eco attempts to sail between Scylla and Charybdis: is interpretation completely open-ended, or must we connect things to the "author's intent"?
We'll read at least Eco's lectures in the collection. We may determine later if we want to read some of the other collected responses.
Our surface goal of this meeting is to understand the author (rather than criticize). Our secondary goal is to formulate a rough "theory" of interpretation that can be applied to any other reading we do.
PDF: https://annas-archive.org/md5/5b2a48f56279dfe34078d7ba4ae842a7
Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Interpretation-Overinterpretation-Tanner-Lectures-Values/dp/0521402271/
Note: Kant FTΦ (Friends Through Philosophy) is a group of individuals who have connected over reading Kant (and other philosophers).
This meeting will focus on regular attendees' interests. We will frequently reference Kant and other philosophers. Discussions may involve shared notions that have developed over time. If you are not a regular attendee and feel lost in the conversation, it may be a byproduct of being newer to the meetings: don't hesitate to ask for clarification.
- From Socrates to Sartre EP21 ⟩ “Marx I: The Young Hegelian”Link visible for attendees
These, the best overview lectures of all time, provide a complete college course in philosophy. Beginners will get clarity and adepts will be revitalized.
Thelma Zeno Lavine’s From Socrates to Sartre: The Philosophic Quest (1978) is the most riveting (her painstaking contortionist elocution), endearing (the eerie, theremin-laced Moog soundtrack, straight from the golden age of PBS), and confrontational (her radical politics and censorship-defying critiques) philosophy lecture series ever produced.
Marx I: The Young Hegelian
Grab your popcorn, comrades—we’re going to Hobbiton. Bring your yeast as well because you’ll want your tasting to be as richly rich as the adventure Thelma will ferment in your imagination: the synoptic biography of the greatest* thinker of the Millennium, Karl Marx.
[*In 1999, the BBC ran a poll-based series, “Greatest ___ of the Millennium.” When the blank was filled as “Thinker,” Karl Marx came out on top. Click this link to see the full list—then ask yourself why Marx alone always comes with such grave warning. There must be some reason for this …]
With this lecture, Lavine finally comes fully home and changes her shoes like Mr. Rogers, and invites us into her private bathroom, deep in the HQ of philosophical explanation, where she does her finest expositing. We are in hyper-excellence territory now, a place so saturated with understanding and clarity that the pastries are baked inside your stomach (in the kitchen behind the bathroom).
Here is the finest overview of Marx’s thought-and-life ever committed to human speech, according to everyone who’s listened to it.
There are many surprises along the way. One is that you will meet someone you’ve never met before—Karl Marx. Yes, Marx himself will present live this week, so bring the questions and complaints you’ve had about the fantasy version of Marx so you can enjoy quality time with the real Marx as he agrees and laughs alongside you.
I think everyone can agree that understanding the striving drive of the greatest person who ever lived is a good idea. So bring your family and even your imaginary friends. Because these placeholders are precisely the voids that Marx’s striving drive yearns to fill.
This outline ought to give you a taste of just how nourishing Lavine’s presentation is:
I. Opening Provocation: What Is the Power of Marxism?
II. Early Life and Formative Influences
A. Trier: Middle-Class Origins, Jewish Enlightenment
B. Berlin University and Intellectual Awakening
III. The Young Hegelians and the Dialectic of Criticism
1. Key Hegelian Ambiguities Exploited by the Young Hegelians
— a. State Absolutism vs. Dialectical Change
— b. Authority vs. Freedom
— c. God as Absolute vs. God as Human
— d. “The real is the rational / the rational is the real”
2. The Three Central Doctrines of the Young Hegelians
— a. Criticism as Weapon
— b. Human Divinity
— c. World Revolution
IV. Feuerbach's Influence (The Great Inversion)
A. Religion as Projection
B. Materialism and Humanism
V. Career Shift: From Philosopher to Revolutionary
A. Journalism and Censorship
B. Paris Years (1843–1845)
VI. The Two Burning Questions in Paris (1844)
Why did the French Revolution fail?
What is the historical role of the Industrial Revolution?
VII. The 1844 Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts
VIII. Marx the Exile: The Refugee Trail BeginsMETHOD
Please watch the tiny 27-minute episode before the event. We will then replay a few short clips during the event for debate and discussion. A version with vastly improved audio can be found here:
Summaries, notes, event chatlogs, episode transcripts, timelines, tables, observations, and downloadable PDFs (seek the FSTS Book Vault) of the episodes we cover can be found here:
ABOUT PROFESSOR LAVINE
Dr. Lavine was professor of philosophy and psychology as Wells College, Brooklyn College, the University of Maryland (10 years), George Washington University (20), and George Mason University (13). She received the Outstanding Faculty Member award while at the University of Maryland and the Outstanding Professor award during her time at George Washington University.
She was not only a Dewey scholar, but a committed evangelist for American pragmatism.
View all of our coming episodes here.