Skip to content

Details

If you are about to give a commencement speech at a university this summer, don’t mention A.I. Or at least don’t say nice things about it, or that it’s going to change the world whether people like it or not, or that it’s the next industrial revolution. If you do, graduating students — who are notoriously heavy A.I. users — will boo you. Who can blame them? LLMs have turned expensive university education into a charade and students are graduating into a less-than-ideal job market. And it’s not just students who aren’t so hot on the future our AI overlords are predicting.

So how can people resist the onslaught of AI, and the narratives of inevitability that are being pushed by Silicon Valley’s AI leaders? Obama’s famous quip “don’t boo, vote!” comes to mind. Indeed, influential AI researcher and author Garry Markus has predicted that anti-AI sentiment will be a major driving force of the 2028 US Presidential election. But so far, most political parties seem to have drunk the Kool-Aid of inevitable technological progress, it might be too late by the time they catch on to how voters think. Is there anything ordinary citizens can do in the meantime? Are narratives of AI inevitability thinly disguised self-fulfilling and self-serving prophecies? And is there a way of reimagining what AI can mean for us all?

About the Speaker:

Ismael Kheroubi Garcia has been working in the AI ethics space since 2020, when he worked on establishing the Alan Turing Institute’s research ethics committee. Since 2022, Ismael has been offering AI ethics and research governance consulting at Kairoi, helping organisations identify crucial tech decisions, anticipate their consequences and implement safeguards to guide decision-making processes. Since 2023, Ismael also leads the Fellow-led AI Interest Group at the RSA (Royal Society of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce). He is also an associate director of We and AI, a diverse community of volunteers working at the intersection of social justice and AI. He is the co-author of “Resisting, Refusing, Reclaiming, Reimagining: Charting Challenges to Narratives of AI Inevitability”.

The Moderator:

Alexis Papazoglou is Managing Editor of the LSE British Politics and Policy blog. He was previously senior editor for the Institute of Arts and Ideas, and a philosophy lecturer at Cambridge and Royal Holloway. His research interests lie broadly in the post-Kantian tradition, including Hegel, Nietzsche, as well as Husserl and Heidegger. His writing has appeared in The Guardian, The Atlantic, The New Republic, WIRED, The Independent, The Conversation, The New European, as well as Greek publications, including Kathimerini.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

This is an online conversation and audience Q&A presented by the UK-based journal The Philosopher. It is open to the public and held on Zoom. The event is free to attend but the Zoom registration page has, by default, an optional donation amount that you can change to $0 (or whatever you wish). Donations go to The Philosopher magazine to cover our costs and expand the scope of our series.

Please send feedback or comments about our events directly to thephilosopher1923@gmail.com. We'd love to hear from you!

About The Philosopher (https://www.thephilosopher1923.org/):

The Philosopher is the longest-running public philosophy journal in the UK (founded in 1923). It is published by the The Philosophical Society of England (http://www.philsoceng.uk/), a registered charity founded ten years earlier than the journal in 1913, and still running regular groups, workshops, and conferences around the UK. As of 2018, The Philosopher is edited by Newcastle-based philosopher Anthony Morgan and is published quarterly, both in print and digitally.

The journal aims to represent contemporary philosophy in all its many and constantly evolving forms, both within academia and beyond. Contributors over the years have ranged from John Dewey and G.K. Chesterton to contemporary thinkers like Christine Korsgaard, Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò, Elizabeth Anderson, Martin Hägglund, Cary Wolfe, Avital Ronell, and Adam Kotsko.

Related topics

Artificial Intelligence
Science
Political Philosophy
Economics
Technology

You may also like