Filosofía china

GDG Competitive Programming Challenge (GCPC) is a programming competition organized by GDG Algiers, bringing together teams of three programmers to solve a series of algorithmic problems of increasing difficulty. This event tests participants' skills in algorithmics, optimization, and problem solving in a competitive and stimulating environment. Within a limited time, teams must design efficient solutions while optimizing their temporal and spatial complexity. The GCPC aims to promote teamwork, quick thinking, and algorithmic creativity, offering participants a unique opportunity to improve their competitive programming skills and measure themselves against the best talent. Agenda --- Hosted By MALEK AMINA, GDG Algiers Lead Nabil Ghemam Djeridi, GDG Algiers Co-Lead Ayyoub Kasmi, GDG Algiers Co-Lead Sirine Ouarab, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Kamel Mokrani, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer GDG Algiers Co-Manager Khalil Lounis, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer ALLAM MAROUA, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Bioinformatics master student and UI/UX designer BOKHTACHE Khawla, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Mohammed Elmahdi BELGHIT, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer BENDAHMANE NESRINE, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Kaoutar Hosseinat, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer boukhemia lyna, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer hamma yasmine, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer MOHAMED RAOUF GUERIOU, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Aicha Lahreche, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer MELZI MOUNIR, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Kheira Assaidi, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Lyes Boudjabout, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Abdelghani Derdouche, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Chamel Nadir Bouacha, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer AOUININE LYLIA, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer BOUDIB MOHAMEDKHALIL, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer MEZENNER FARES, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer sohaib zouambia, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer afnane touhar, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer abderrahman ben rabah, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Belkis Nour Balamane, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Nesrine Merrouchi, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Abdeldjalil Lamara, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Alaaeddine Bendali Braham, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Anes Mezdoud, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer YEKENE SOFIANE, GDG Algiers Co-Organizer Complete your event RSVP here: https://gdg.community.dev/events/details/google-gdg-algiers-presents-gcpc-30/.

Main Library, Meeting Room 2B Join us for a welcoming evening of reflection, gentle music, and meaningful conversation. We’ll begin with a short grounding moment, followed by a brief reading from spiritual or philosophical traditions, and an open reflection circle where participants can share (or simply listen). Libera Animae is an interfaith community focused on inner growth, creativity, and authentic connection. All backgrounds are welcome.

You can also join the meeting by Conference Call at (518) 263-8851.

ASH is Atheists, Skeptics and Humanists of First Unitarian Universalists of Columbus Ohio TBD Snacks are usually available, and you are welcome to bringing something to share!

We are a real world Martial arts group. \ Called DO JUNG ISHU (the art of fighting) \ Based off of Jeet kune do we just continued where Bruce Lee left off. \ We have been around a while. \ We are donation based. Every week we get together and work technical skills and live pressure testing. \ Almost all of the instructors have been in everything from altercations in the real world to the ring and some still compete in the cage. \ If you want to take your skills up, improve your confidence, gain self defense skills, get in better shape, test yourself or just want to kill some time and possibly get hit a bit come on down. \ We will be located at 3923 N High St, Columbus, OH 43214 inside the whetstone rec center in the auditorium, upstairs in classroom B or outside in the grass between the playground and horseshoe area. our instructors are normally in a black and red art of fighting shirt \ if you can not find us call or text me at 6143570295 Saturday 1pm Wednesday 5:30pm From Age 16 and up. attendees under the age of 18 must have a guardian with them. \ \ You must have a free leisure card for the rec center and must be registered for our class specifically .\ Wear workout clothing \ Bring a MOUTHPIECE! \ WE HAVE GLOVES. \ Hope to see you soon :-).\ We are run off of donations. \ let me know if you have any questions :)

When judging morality, should we prioritize **intentions/duty** or **outcomes/results**? It introduces two influential philosophers as representatives of these approaches. * **Immanuel Kant (deontology):** An action is moral when it is done from **duty** and follows rational, universal principles (the **categorical imperative**). Certain acts—like lying—are wrong regardless of the consequences; you can’t do a wrong thing for a right reason. * **John Stuart Mill (utilitarian consequentialism):** The morality of an action is determined by its **effects**, specifically how much **happiness/well-being** it produces. Mill argues that some pleasures are “higher” than others, and that good intentions don’t redeem harmful outcomes. ## Discussion Questions 1. **The lying dilemma:** A murderer comes to your door and asks if your friend is hiding inside. Kant would say you must not lie. 2. **Can good intentions rescue a bad outcome?** 3. **The organ harvest problem:** A surgeon has five patients dying of organ failure and one healthy patient in for a checkup. Killing the one to harvest organs would save five lives, and the math works out for the utilitarian. Why does this feel so deeply wrong? Is that feeling a point in Kant's favor, or just a bias we should overcome? 4. **Do rules need exceptions?** Kant insists moral rules must be universal, with no exceptions. But most of us can imagine extreme scenarios where any rule seems like it should bend. Does the need for exceptions fatally undermine deontology, or is the strength of the system precisely that it refuses to bend? 5. **Who gets to calculate the consequences?** Utilitarianism asks us to maximize good outcomes, but we're notoriously bad at predicting consequences. If we can't reliably know the results of our actions, is it practical to base our entire moral system on outcomes? Does this uncertainty push us back toward rules and principles? 6. **Everyday morality:** Think about a real moral decision you've made recently, even a small one. Did you reason more like a Kantian (what's the right thing to do in principle?) or more like a utilitarian (what will produce the best result?)? Do most people naturally lean one way? 7. **Justice vs. the greater good:** A town can prevent a deadly plague by sacrificing one innocent person. The greater good is clearly served. But is it just? Can an action be morally right and deeply unjust at the same time? 8. **The big synthesis question:** Are these two systems actually opposed, or do they often arrive at the same answers by different paths? Is it possible that we need both: rules to guide us in the moment and consequences to evaluate systems and policies over time?