Aller au contenu

Détails

The Eurovision Song Contest isn’t just a celebration of music, it’s a cultural and political spectacle that’s evolved alongside Europe itself. From its humble beginnings in 1956 as a French-led experiment in non-political cross-border harmony, it’s grown into a global phenomenon that reflects the continent’s shifting dynamics. Early editions were a quiet affair, a way for nations to bond over shared history and shared dreams. But as Europe fractured, politically and economically, the contest became a mirror, sometimes reflecting the tensions beneath the surface.

Now, though, the mirror’s cracked. With Israel’s participation and the withdrawal of five countries, the rules, including the non-politics, involvement feel arbitrary. And what does that say about the contest’s own relevance? Should the Eurovision evolve?

This debate will follow a British Parliamentary format with eight debaters split into four teams of two.

Participants who wish to speak are highly encouraged to bring a paper and pen. You are welcome to participate even if you have no prior debating experience.

We aim for debates that are respectful, constructive, and welcoming:

  • Respect ideas and people Listen actively, stay quiet while others speak, and debate arguments, not identities or beliefs.
  • Be concise and civil Keep questions short and relevant; avoid hostility, hate speech, or discrimination.
  • Respect boundaries and time No unwanted advances or suggestive behavior; arrive on time to avoid disrupting the debate.
  • Follow moderators They guide the discussion and ensure fairness.

Les membres s'intéressent également à