Amidst the Shutdown, the Raping of Women goes on--even in the U. S. military

From: Norma Jeane Y.
Sent on: Thursday, October 10, 2013 8:20 PM

When I was first active in the Feminist Movement in the early '70's in Chattanooga, TN--& spearheading forming a rape prevention & crisis center in the early days of that part of the Movement, we were dealing with the same kinds of "blame the rape victim" travesties that are going on STILL as evidenced by this statement from the Editorial Board of the New York Times.
It is absolutely UNACCEPTABLE that females in the military are risking their lives to protect our country--right alongside their male colleagues--& yet still have to worry about being sexually assaulted!  Not only is it a Crime Against Women--it is bad for the cohesiveness, trust & team effort so required in the military, especially when trust & cooperation can be a life & death matter.
These sexist methods of questioning a rape victim--in fact putting the rape victim herself on trial--not her attackers--are indefensibly, reprehensibly archaic & stem from centuries-old sexist attitudes that originate from sexist religions.
It all needs to STOP NOW!!
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Kirsten Gillibrand <[address removed]>
To: [address removed]
Sent: Wednesday, October 9,[masked]:52 PM
Subject: must read

I know you are with me on tackling the sexual assault crisis in the military, so I wanted to show you something I just read in the Times.
This editorial is a great reminder of why we are in this fight – and why it is so important that we win. I hope you will take a moment to read it and share it with your friends and family.
I am so glad to have you with me on this. We are making real headway, and I know that if we keep up the fight, we will be able to create the independent, objective and fair military justice system worthy of the sacrifices of our brave men and women in uniform.

Broken Military Justice

The New York Times
The abusive grilling last month of a female midshipman in a case involving three former United States Naval Academy football players provided further evidence that the military’s handling of sexual assault complaints is seriously flawed.
The woman, who has accused the three athletes of raping her at an alcohol-fueled “yoga and toga” party, was interrogated for about 30 hours over several days. Defense lawyers asked her questions that were irrelevant to the alleged crime and unlikely to be allowed in civilian courts, like whether she wore a bra.
Her ordeal occurred during a preliminary hearing, known as an Article 32 proceeding, that helps determine whether cases are sent to courts-martial. According to military law experts, the harsh and degrading cross-examination was not unique.
The Joint Service Committee on Military Justice, which reviews changes to military law, has now approved a proposal that would clarify the rules for Article 32 hearings to better shield sexual assault victims from unreasonably aggressive questioning.
This would be a useful step. But more fundamental structural changes to the military justice system are required to give victims confidence that they will be treated fairly if they come forward.
One crucial change would be to give independent, professionally trained military prosecutors, not commanders with built-in conflicts of interest, the power to decide which sexual assault and other serious cases to try. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a Democrat of New York, has offered promising legislation that would make this change, but it has been opposed by the military brass and by Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat and the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, who favors less sweeping reform.


Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy