addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1linklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

Re: [ljc] Am I a bad programmer if I do not like pair programming?

From: Wesley H.
Sent on: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:13 AM

Yes, you are terrible!! Please leave the industry immediately! ;).

I was quite surprised to read the part about people not being prepared to stand up and say they don't like pair programming, my experience has been that people tend to be quite vocal about this. I have actually been one of these people.

That said, I have come around quite a bit in recent years. I tend to find that PP works much better if you are also using TDD, since this is a process that tends to lead to quite a lot of 'inner dialogue', even when you are working alone and it is useful to share this.

I think it is important to remember that pair programming is a skill of it's own, it's not just a matter of two programmers sitting at one screen. A singles tennis player is not automatically good at doubles, they still need to train, and people that are good at one thing, tend to get frustrated when they feel less good at a similar thing.

I am still learning. I can get a bit bossy when I am the non-keyboard member, and get twinges of annoyance when I am typing and get reminded to do something that I was just about to do.

On the whole though, I am now quite a vocal supporter of the process. When I come back to code that was developed a while ago and try to understand it, I find a strong correlation between it being understandable and it being pair programmed. I am no longer looking at the historical content of a single person's mind.

All this said, provided you have a good understanding of the kinds of things that pair programming solves, and have another mechanism to solve them. Then there is nothing wrong with having another approach. Personally, I hate doing code reviews, and I often have to pester the original coder to try to figure out what they were thinking, (either, "What were they thinking?" or "WHAT WERE THEY *THINKING*!!!). My experience is that code reviews tend to become very half arsed very quickly. YMMV.



On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Jim Collins <[address removed]> wrote:

I was wondering if there are other programmers out there who feel they are bad programmers because they do not like pair programming.

I feel that I am much more productive working on my own and it is how I enjoy to work. If I am working on something particularly difficult then I will often ask a colleague what they think and when I commit code I also talk my colleagues through what I have done in a code review. That is how I have always worked and how I enjoy working.

I sometimes get the feeling that pair programming is like the emperors new clothes. No one will stand up and say I don't like this so we all continue in this vicious circle :).



Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Jim Collins ([address removed]) from LJC - London Java Community.
To learn more about Jim Collins, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | [address removed]

Our Sponsors

  • Our Blog

    Read the latest news from the LJC

  • RecWorks Ltd

    Fixing Tech Recruitment using the Power of Community

  • jClarity

    Java/JVM Performance Analysis Tools & mentoring for Java related matters

  • LJC Aggrity

    Our LJC Aggrity site contains blog posts from our members

  • LJC Book Club

    Our Book club with book reviews from our members

  • Devoxx UK

    Java Community Conference in collaboration with the LJC, 8-10th June 16

  • SkillsMatter

    "Host, help organise, promote, film many of our meetings."

  • IBM

    Build Enterprise-grade apps at start-up speed.

  • New Relic

    New Relic makes sense of billions of metrics a day in real time.

  • Hazelcast

    Hazelcast is the leader in operating in-memory computing.

  • Java.Net

    We are an official Java User Group recognised by Oracle's JUG program

  • JRebel

    Free 3 month J-Rebel license.

  • O'Reilly

    40% discount on printed books and 50% on e-books.

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy