I agree with you mostly. The whole thing is actually co-opted between the
Jewish Rothschild Bank and it's subsidiaries and the British Bank of England
in partnership with the multi-national corporations.
These "adherents" to the white supremacist movement are either completely
unaware by now of what's going on around them or they are actually Federal
agents in disguise. This is proven when you look at any of their
demonstrations (WHAT DEMONSTRATIONS?)
On November 19, 2005, a rally was organized in response to the assault of a
14-year old white student, seriously injured by an older black student at
Kingston High School. The white student's injuries required several
re-constructive surgeries. The much larger black student who attacked the
white student said, "I HATE YOU WHITE NIGGERS." and then proceeded to punch
him in the face.
All the major white supremacist groups were called upon to join the rally
and voice their support. Most were no-shows --- only a small assortment of
various groups gathered, some wearing ski masks. These masked madmen
pretending to be in support of the rally began hurling rocks at police and
threatening people thus ending the rally before it had really gotten
started. The largest showing BY FAR was from the black gang community who
were dressed in full battle gear ready to kill.
If this is how "white supremacists" react when they are clearly being
overrun by violent blacks then why should the lie be allowed to continue?
By the way, that black student was never charged with a hate crime. Imagine
how things would be different if the roles had been reversed.
>From: "Mark E. Smith" <[address removed]>
>Reply-To: [address removed]
>To: [address removed]
>Subject: Re: [9-11-279] New Event: Double Feature: The Immigration Invasion
>Date: Wed, 30 May[masked]:58:58 -0400 (EDT)
>They didn't invade our state, Dane, they were here first. And if anyone was
>violent, it was the U.S. in citing manifest destiny to justify invading,
>occupying, and annexing their land.
>The white supremacy movement is very real, has hundreds of websites, lots
>literature, and many adherents, not just WAR and the Christian Identity
>movement, but in many other spin-offs.
>You may not be aware that the 2000 Presidential election was stolen by
>of suppressing the black vote all over the country, but I suggest you read
>Greg Palast's book, "Armed Madhouse" for the details and statistics. This
>wasn't done by the Ku Klux Klan nor did Jews invent and control the Klan or
>the Republican party.
>Yes, Silverstein and Wolfowitz are Jewish, but George Bush and Dick Cheney
>are not. They are not ruled by Israel, as you may believe, but by their
>common interest in capitalist profit and in funnelling money and power to
>the wealthy elite who, themselves are a mix of every ethnicity,
>and religious belief there is. The only thing they have in common is their
>desire to destroy the planet and wage wars for profit. They don't care who
>wins, who dies, or which countries benefit. The arms trade sells equally to
>both or all sides in any war--whoever has the money can buy the weapons. No
>matter where our jobs go, the corporate elite profits.
>If you think that some White House bigshot or Congress Member with millions
>or billions of dollars in war profits sitting in their offshore bank
>is being dictated to by AIPAC, you have very little familiarity with
>economics. They are strictly profit-driven and they are not driven by any
>ideology they may claim.
>Take a hint from the Russians. They have a bona fide history of
>anti-Semitism, but their word for gangster isn't Jew, it is businessman.
>On 5/30/07, Dane Bacon <[address removed]> wrote:
>>I agree with Dana and share her concern for the aggressive and violent la
>>raza Mexicans invading OUR state with the help of corporations and
>>government leaders. Calling people ignorant and racist is a
>>the same exact trick the Jews use repeatedly by calling people
>>"anti-semetic" whenever their system of control and propaganda gets shaken
>>by the truth.
>>The whole "white supremacy movement" is propaganda put out by the elite.
>>There are no REAL white supremacists aside from some back country bumpkins
>>and people in prison who have to defend themselves from other violent
>> >From: "Mark E. Smith" <[address removed]>
>> >Reply-To: [address removed]
>> >To: [address removed]
>> >Subject: Re: [9-11-279] New Event: Double Feature: The Immigration
>> >& Trespassing Allow
>> >Date: Wed, 30 May[masked]:29:38 -0400 (EDT)
>> >So you think that immigration has something to do with 9/11 truth, Dana?
>> >know that immigrants didn't do it, but you think that by understanding
>> >the government is outsourcing your jobs and letting in immigrants,
>> >find some key to 9/11 truth?
>> >Immigrants who work in the fields, slaughterhouses, meat packing plants,
>> >as dishwashers, don't get health care, bank accounts, housing, and jobs.
>> >they didn't they wouldn't come here because U.S. citizens would have
>> >all those jobs.
>> >Google "ICE raids" if you don't think immigrants are being deported. I
>> >believe that somebody is pretending not to know about this.
>> >As for our invading and annexing Mexico, you can't rewrite history. We
>> >and that's a fact.
>> >And when this was Mexico, settlers got a better deal here than they did
>> >the rest of the U.S.
>> >I don't know how you fell for Minutemen/Rush Limbaugh propaganda, but
>> >ignorance isn't my problem. When somebody tries to insert that crap into
>> >9/11 truth group that I happen to belong to, then it becomes my problem.
>> >Sure, not all immigrants have the house with picket fence American
>> >They're sleeping in the fields because they can't afford rent on what
>> >they're paid, IF they're paid (often they're just threatened with
>> >deportation and not paid at all), and you want them to look clean and
>> >How would you look after a few days working in the fields or a
>> >slaughterhouse without proper housing so you could clean up?
>> >Paul, let me explain to you why our government appears to be pushing
>> >immigrantion. You do know why they outsource jobs, right? For business,
>> >bottom line is the bottom line, so lower wages mean more profits. Watch
>> >documentary "The Corporation" if you don't understand this. Now try to
>> >understand that if lower wages are better for business, no wages at all,
>> >slave labor, is best. That's why Henry Ford and Prescott Bush supported
>> >Hitler. That's why many Americans supported slavery. That's why Bush had
>> >Bechtel and Halliburton build detention camps all over the U.S., and
>> >why they are running these Gestapo raids on places where there is a lot
>> >undocumented labor. But don't think for a minute that once they put the
>> >immigrants in camps or deport them, you can get those minimum wage
>> >backbreaking jobs in the fields or in slaughterhouses. You'd want
>> >wage whereas they can use prison labor, particularly from our privatized
>> >prisons for less than they'd have to pay somebody in China or India.
>> >And when it comes your turn to be rounded up for slave labor, don't say
>> >didn't try to warn you. Google Pastor Niehmoller--people as ignorant and
>> >racist as you existed in Nazi Germany too.
>> >If the White Supremacy movement succeeds in hijacking the 9/11 truth
>> >movement, you'll find out too late that you weren't fighting fascism,
>> >were promoting it.
>> >On 5/30/07, Dana <[address removed]> wrote:To Mark and others,
>> >I am not currently living in San Diego, but have been considering it as
>> >mini vacation. However I feel Mark you are not seeing the whole
>> >The global government is what is enabling these illegals to come here in
>> >the first place. I have not met any of you in this group, but I think
>> >group is aware of that. Companies give them health care, bank accounts,
>> >housing, and jobs without ever showing any form of ID. Now if you are a
>> >legal citizen of this country try doing that. You will be denied on the
>> >and probably laughed at.
>> >You have very good points, but you aren't making the connection. The
>> >government already has the laws in place to deport Illegals, but that is
>> >being done because of a global government plan and the North American
>> >I agree that a fence, at this time, would only be to keep us in. The
>> >you get the illegals out of here is cut off their source of goods and
>> >which would be fining any company that hires them without checking
>> >This includes the middle class American that owns a landscaping
>> >That in itself would scare companies and then illegals would go
>> >know there are some great Hispanics trying to make a living here and
>> >people I am not as concerned with (however they should go through the
>> >bureaucracy we do as citizens). The type I am concerned with are those
>> >wrap themselves in the Mexican flag saying that California, Texas, and
>> >Arizona are now Mexico (la raza). They are the ones that want to kill
>> >and turn the southern part of the US into another Mexico. Mark have you
>> >heard of "The Plan of San
>> >The problem is the mainstream media only shows the good working
>> >with 2 kids, well-dressed, in a nice little house. What they don't want
>> >show you is what it is really like. If they are so proud of Mexico then
>> >are they coming here in the first place? Our government should put
>> >on Mexico to get their country in order. We cannot support 20+ million
>> >illegals, but I think nationally the numbers are more along the lines of
>> >I am glad that some others felt the need to reply because I thought I
>> >alone. =D
>> >On 5/30/07, Paul Cofrancesco <[address removed]> wrote:
>> >> Dana,
>> >>Those were good points. I think issues like immigration get confusing
>> >>because there so many aspects to them. Many of the concerns for and
>> >>immigration are valid, but the real question in mind is why is our
>> >>government pushing it so much. I think the immigration debate is
>> >>with propanganda both pro and con and the part that is most easily lost
>> >>why is our governent pusing it - especially in light of 911 and the
>> >>war on terror.
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >>*From:* [address removed] [mailto:[address removed]] *On Behalf Of
>> >>*Sent:* Wednesday, May 30,[masked]:40 AM
>> >>*To:* [address removed]
>> >>*Subject:* Re: [9-11-279] New Event: Double Feature: The Immigration
>> >>Invasion & Trespassing Allow
>> >>To Mark and others,
>> >>I am glad that some others felt the need to reply because I thought I
>> >>alone. =D
>> >>Please Note: If you hit "*REPLY*", your message will be sent to
>> >>*everyone*on this mailing list (
>> >>[address removed])
>> >>This message was sent by Paul Cofrancesco ([address removed])
>> >>The San Diego 9/11 Questions Meetup Group.
>> >>To learn more about Paul Cofrancesco, visit his/her member
>> >>To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click
>> >> Meetup.com Customer Service: [address removed]
>> >>632 Broadway New York NY 10012 USA
>>Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on
>>this mailing list ([address removed])
>>This message was sent by Dane Bacon ([address removed]) from The
>>San Diego 9/11 Questions Meetup Group.
>>To learn more about Dane Bacon, visit his/her member profile:
>>To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here:
>>Meetup.com Customer Service: [address removed]
>>632 Broadway New York NY 10012 USA