About us
We're a community that practices and discusses philosophy, being free and open to all levels and backgrounds. We offer seminars, a variety of discussion formats, and the occasional lecture / guest speaker.
Many meetings will have fewer RSVPs than people who actually attend. This is because overtime people stop making use of Meetup.com and instead communicate with their groups via Discord, Slack, Zoom, E-mail, or similar You can think of the list of events hosted on this Meetup as advertisements for groups seeking new participants.
Our philosophy offerings are organized and facilitated by volunteers. If you have a philosophy offering - or an offering that compliments the study of philosophy, such as in literature, the sciences, and so on - that you'd like to advertise through this Meetup, please contact the organizer. We're grateful to those who want to enrich Seattle with study and discussion!
Participants must speak, write, and act in a considerate, professional, and respectful manner, and be prepared for the meetings that they attend, having reviewed the materials to the degree necessary to participate. If you haven't reviewed the materials but still wish to attend an event, please consult the event facilitator regarding the best manner for you to be present.
We look forward to studying philosophy together!
Upcoming events
509

The Map is Not the Territory: Navigating Your Mental Maps.
·OnlineOnlineAGNOSTICS GROUP - Melbourne, Australia.
Some of us are participating in their online event.
Dr. Steve Parker will present the topic and lead the discussion.
"The Map is Not the Territory: Navigating Your Mental Maps"
~The Agnostics Group discusses the pros and cons of Agnosticism.
They welcome ALL viewpoints, including criticism of Agnosticism~Agnostics Group Facebook
The ZOOM Link will appear for those who RSVP.
Meeting ID: 854 4520 2677 - - Passcode: 404849Existentialist Society's Website - - YouTube - - Weekly Zoom Meetups
9 attendees
Foucault Interlude: A Preface to Transgression & The History of Sexuality
·OnlineOnlineWe are taking a break from Bataille's Erotism (1957) to read two major texts from Michel Foucault over the next several weeks**:**
"A Preface to Transgression" (1963), and
The History of Sexuality, Volume 1 (1976)Reading schedule
Access the weekly reading schedule at this link:
https://sites.google.com/view/existentialism-and-its-critics/You can find all texts in the Google folder linked at the VERY BOTTOM of this description. The Zoom link is also posted there.
👇 scroll all the way down for the links 👇ABOUT THIS PROJECT
Foucault regarded Bataille as "one of the most important writers of his century" and was deeply influenced by his approach to thought and the unknown. The first piece above was written as a tribute to Bataille shortly after his death and published in the journal Critique, which Bataille himself started in 1946. It shows us the early Foucault of the archeological method. Though falling in the broadly structuralist tradition, Foucault is here nonetheless preoccupied with themes of death, the void and limit-experiences. As we see, he directly inherits the problematic of transgression that we've encountered so forcefully in Bataille.By 1976 Foucault is well into his genealogical period. His approach to sexuality is now avowedly historical, focused on the specificity of discursive practices and the power relations that permeate them. This is a post-structuralist Foucault, less interested in sweeping logics such as that of transgression and more intent on the local and the particular.
The sustained focus on sexuality, together with the momentum we’ve gathered through our reading of Bataille, offer us an attractive opportunity to trace this rupture / evolution in Foucault's thought. Once we complete this interlude, we'll return to Part 2 of Bataille's Erotism.
SOME DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
- Is the well-known transition from archeology to genealogy evident in Foucault's texts on sexuality that we are reading? Does "A Preface to Transgression" fit neatly in the archeological category, or does it already contain seeds of a future development?
- What is Foucault's attitude towards transgression in The History of Sexuality? Is transgression still foundational to his understanding of sexuality in 1976?
- The death of God is a dominant theme for the early Foucault, as it is for Bataille. Yet post-structuralism is often said to distance itself from the heady obsession with death, lack, void, abyss, negation and the like. Is such a shift observable in Foucault's writings on sexuality?
- We've seen the outlines of a radical Hegelianism in Bataille (inspired by his exchanges with Kojève). Can we discern Foucault's stance towards this Hegelian background? Where does (or would) he stand on the questions of dialectic, Aufhebung, reconciliation and the negative that Bataille has addressed at various points?
***
ABOUT THE BATAILLE GROUP
This is a comprehensive reading group focusing on the works of French writer Georges Bataille. We are reading key texts from Bataille himself, as well as tracing his relationship with other major thinkers such as Hegel, Nietzsche, André Breton/Surrealism, Blanchot, Lacan, Foucault, Deleuze, Derrida, etc.Some familiarity with Bataille's mode and style of thought is helpful but not necessary. You're welcome to join the group in medias res at any time. See, however, the group rules below.
Please take the time to read and reflect on the reading prior to each meeting. Everyone is welcome to attend, but speaking priority will be given to people who have read the text.
Topics to be discussed in the future:
- Return to the 2nd part of Erotism
- Bataille's critique of Hegel: the negative and general economy
- Derrida's reading of Bataille in "From Restricted to General Economy"
Past topics included:
- Bataille's Erotism, Part 1 & the logic of transgression
- Bataillean transgression and Deleuzian line of flight: reading Fitzgerald's "The Crack-Up"
- Bataille's aesthetics: the rift with Surrealism
- Susan Sontag on avant-guarde literature
- Bataille's novel Blue of Noon
- Inner Experience and a-theological mysticism
- Bataille's reading of Nietzsche and critique of fascism
***
MORE ABOUT BATAILLE
Georges Bataille stands out as an eclectic, fascinating and controversial figure in the world of French letters. A contemporary of Sartre and Lacan, he combined ideas from diverse disciplines to create a unique position that he called 'base materialism'. In the early 20s, Bataille abandoned Catholicism, embraced psychoanalysis and Marxism and initiated an unorthodox search for the sacred in late modernity. His obsessive pursuit of ecstatic liminal experiences took him across the boundaries of philosophy, sociology, political economy, mythology, poetry, literature and mystical theology. His works develop a libidinal economy of unconditioned expenditure, offer a critique of fascism and embrace marginal experiences in the style of the French poets. Though he remained largely outside the academic mainstream and worked as a librarian, Bataille is a formative precursor to the post-structuralist philosophers of the '60s -- and may well be more relevant to our time than ever.In this group we look at a significant cross-section of Bataille's texts. Our aim is to understand his thought on its own terms as well as place him in the context of his predecessors and the French thinkers who followed his lead. In view of Bataille's early relationship with Surrealism, the referenced artworks will spotlight this movement.
***
GROUP RULES
- Please spend 1-2 hours per week reading and preparing for the discussion.
- Keep your comments concise and relevant to the text.
- Please limit each comment to a maximum of 2-3 minutes. You're welcome to speak as many times as you wish.
- Virtual meeting courtesy: let's not interrupt each other and keep mics muted when not speaking.
- We'll focus the discussion with key passages and discussion questions. Be sure to bring your favorite passages, questions, comments, criticisms, etc.
***
Join the Facebook group for more resources and discussion:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/755460079505498If you have attended previous meetings, please fill out a brief survey at this link: https://forms.gle/tEMJ4tw2yVgnTsQD6
All readings can be found in this Google folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1VPRdvZYmUKBY3cSxD8xC8sTYtSEKBXDs
Zoom link:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81251109319?pwd=R3hVQ2RqcVBvaHJwYnoxMFJ5OXJldz09Art: À mon seul désir (1979) by Gerard Fromanger
4 attendees![[online] What is happiness, really? ( Viktor Frankl & Zadie Smith )](https://secure.meetupstatic.com/photos/event/2/7/e/c/highres_532450220.jpeg)
[online] What is happiness, really? ( Viktor Frankl & Zadie Smith )
·OnlineOnlineLearn more about Premise. We offer guided conversations about life's big questions
🟡 Space is limited, register today!
Please register directly with Premise here:
https://www.premiseinstitute.com/event-details/what-is-happiness-really-3It helps us keep things organized, since participants join from multiple places.
👉 Use the code `seattlemeetup` if you are unable to pay. The session will be no cost. All registration fees go directly to expanding Premise to communities nationwide.
Texts:
We will email you the readings when you register.- Viktor Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning (Selected chapter: “The Case for Tragic Optimism”)
- Zadie Smith, “Joy”
- Arthur C. Brooks, “To Get Happier, Make Yourself Smaller”
⏱️ Preparation: Less than 1.5 hours
Session Description
What is happiness, really?
We live in a culture that treats happiness as both a personal responsibility and a measurable outcome. We are encouraged to manage it, improve it, and display it. But what if this framework misunderstands the experience altogether?In this session, we’ll explore whether happiness can coexist with suffering, whether joy requires letting go of control, and whether a meaningful life might look different from a happy one. Together, we’ll examine what happens when we stop asking how to be happier and start asking what we are orienting our lives toward instead.
These readings create productive friction for conversation: happiness as a goal versus happiness as a byproduct, self focus versus self transcendence, and permanence versus momentary joy. They ask whether our pursuit of happiness reflects clarity about what we want, or confusion about what actually sustains a life.
In this session, we will ask:
- If happiness can’t be pursued directly, what can we pursue that makes happiness more likely to emerge?
- Can joy and suffering coexist, or does one cancel out the other?
- What’s the difference between a “happy” life and a “meaningful” life?
- When does self improvement become self obsession?
What Premise is like?
Join us in a welcoming, guided conversation space that invites people from all walks of life to think in public together with curiosity, openness, and respect. You do not need academic credentials or philosophical background. All you need is a willingness to read thoughtfully and reflect honestly.10 attendees
Past events
5550



