addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-leftarrow-right-10x10arrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcredit-cardcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobe--smallglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1languagelaunch-new-window--smalllight-bulblightning-boltlinklocation-pinlockm-swarmSearchmailmediummessagesminusmobilemoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstar-shapestartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahooyoutube

Here is how the "Clinton Foundation Scam" works.....

From: Charles O. W.
Sent on: Monday, August 3, 2015, 10:15 AM

> The article linked below is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as
> a tax free international money laundering scheme.  It will probably eventually prove to be the largest political
> criminal enterprise in US history.
>  
> This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes.  All tax free. 

> Here's how it works:
  
> 1. You create a separate foreign
> "charity".  In this case one in
> Canada.    

> 2. Foreign oligarchs and
> governments, many sworn enemies of the United States, then
> donate to this Canadian charity.  In this case, over
> 1,000 did, contributing mega millions.  I'm sure
> they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and
> expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies
> waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold
> millions to a Canadian charity).  

> 3. The Canadian charity then
> bundles these separate donations and makes a massive
> donation to the Clinton Foundation.    

> 4. The Clinton Foundation and the
> cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits
> the identification of individual donors.  (As the
> article indicates, this is not true.)  

> 5. The Clinton Foundation then
> "spends" some of this money for legitimate good
> works programs.  Unfortunately, experts believe this is
> on the order of 10%.  Much of the balance goes to
> enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries to untold numbers of
> hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc.  Again,
> virtually all tax free, which means you and I are
> subsidizing it.  

> 6. The Clinton Foundation, with
> access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to
> report much of this on their tax filings.  They
> discover these "clerical errors" and begin the
> process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.  

> 7. Net result - foreign money,
> much of it from enemies of the US, goes into the
> Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the
> original donor.  This is the textbook definition of
> money laundering.  
> The linkage between these foreign
> donations, and favors done by the Clintons (including
> Hillary as Secretary of State) will be the subject of a
> future note from your humble correspondent. This will
> extend money laundering into bribery and
> treason.    

> Oh, by the way, the Canadian
> "charity" includes as a principal one Frank
> Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy who was
> central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian
> company that somehow acquired massive US uranium interests
> and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia
> and Putin. This transaction required US State Department
> approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the
> approval was granted. 
 
> As an aside, imagine how former
> Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels.  That
> poor schlep is in jail because he and
> his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor
> favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company.  Not
> legal but not exactly putting US security at
> risk.
>  
> Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to
> get unidentified foreign money to the Clintons, ask yourself
> this:  Why did these foreign interests funnel money
> through a Canadian charity?  Why not donate directly to
> the Clinton Foundation?  Better yet, why not donate
> money directly to the people, organizations and countries in
> need?
 
> This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
> Now you know why

> Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she
> was willing to take.  One "smoking gun"
> e-mail would land her in jail.  

> Anyway, please read and
> weep.  These grifters could someday be back in the
> White House.  
>

People in this
group are also in: