> The article linked below is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as
> a tax free international money laundering scheme. It will probably eventually prove to be the largest political
> criminal enterprise in US history.
>
> This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free.
> Here's how it works:
> 1. You create a separate foreign
> "charity". In this case one in
> Canada.
> 2. Foreign oligarchs and
> governments, many sworn enemies of the United States, then
> donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over
> 1,000 did, contributing mega millions. I'm sure
> they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and
> expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies
> waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold
> millions to a Canadian charity).
> 3. The Canadian charity then
> bundles these separate donations and makes a massive
> donation to the Clinton Foundation.
> 4. The Clinton Foundation and the
> cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits
> the identification of individual donors. (As the
> article indicates, this is not true.)
> 5. The Clinton Foundation then
> "spends" some of this money for legitimate good
> works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is
> on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to
> enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries to untold numbers of
> hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again,
> virtually all tax free, which means you and I are
> subsidizing it.
> 6. The Clinton Foundation, with
> access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to
> report much of this on their tax filings. They
> discover these "clerical errors" and begin the
> process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
> 7. Net result - foreign money,
> much of it from enemies of the US, goes into the
> Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the
> original donor. This is the textbook definition of
> money laundering.
> The linkage between these foreign
> donations, and favors done by the Clintons (including
> Hillary as Secretary of State) will be the subject of a
> future note from your humble correspondent. This will
> extend money laundering into bribery and
> treason.
> Oh, by the way, the Canadian
> "charity" includes as a principal one Frank
> Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was
> central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian
> company that somehow acquired massive US uranium interests
> and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia
> and Putin. This transaction required US State Department
> approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the
> approval was granted.
> As an aside, imagine how former
> Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That
> poor schlep is in jail because he and
> his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor
> favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not
> legal but not exactly putting US security at
> risk.
>
> Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to
> get unidentified foreign money to the Clintons, ask yourself
> this: Why did these foreign interests funnel money
> through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to
> the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate
> money directly to the people, organizations and countries in
> need?
> This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
> Now you know why
> Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she
> was willing to take. One "smoking gun"
> e-mail would land her in jail.
> Anyway, please read and
> weep. These grifters could someday be back in the
> White House.
>