RE: [rlccef] FW: [9-12-melbourne] Fwd: Barack I Versus George III

From: Roger G.
Sent on: Saturday, July 5, 2014 8:32 AM
Scott,
I agree it should be called an invasion, but this administration will not. Obama has failed to enforce our existing laws, allowed the invasion to happen, and calls the influx of people a "humanitarian crisis" and expects the states to assume the costs of supporting these people.

For this issue, I think dereliction of duty is applicable; For arming and providing material support and resources to our enemies, Treason.

Truly, if Obama was the enemy, with all the word implies, WHAT would he do differently to bring America down?

The enemy IS in our midst!
Roger,
Sent via my Samsung GALAXY S® 5


-------- Original message --------
From: Scott Cuthbert <[address removed]>
Date:07/05/2014 7:02 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: [address removed]
Subject: RE: [rlccef] FW: [9-12-melbourne] Fwd: Barack I Versus George III

FYI.
Does anyone else think what is happening on our southern boarder is anything but a foreign invasion?
 
United States Constitution:
 
Article I, Section 10, Clause 3:   "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
 
Article IV, Section 4: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence".
 
Is the complete failure of this President's and his refusal to protect our States from foreign invasion for purely partisan political reasons a dereliction of duty? Treason?


From: [address removed] [mailto:[address removed]] On Behalf Of Bob White
Sent: Friday, July 04,[masked]:06 AM
To: [address removed]
Subject: [rlccef] FW: [9-12-melbourne] Fwd: Barack I Versus George III


 





If you're having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online.

Share This:
 
Special July 4, 2014 Posting . . .
Barack Obama Impersonates King George III
 By: George Noga - July 4, 2014
 
       Read the Declaration of Independence as I try to do every Independence Day and you will be struck by the similarities of the complaints listed in the Declaration against King George III and the actions of President Barack I. King George's acts were adjudged by our founders egregious enough to revolt against Great Britain and to fight a long, bloody war for independence. What of the actions of President Barack? Following are only five instances where Barack I's actions closely parallel those of George III. 
  1. The Declaration states: "He (King George) has forbidden his Governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance." Obama has acted to prevent several states (Arizona) from enforcing laws to protect their citizens from imminent harm.

  2. The Declaration reads: "He has suspended laws in their operation until his assent should be obtained." Obama suspended parts of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - unilaterally. Obama also has vowed not to enforce parts of our immigration laws and, in fact, to take actions directly contrary to such laws.

  3. Again the Declaration: "He has dissolved representative houses for opposing his invasions of the rights of the people." His recess appointments while the Senate  clearly was NOT in recess are tantamount to dissolving a representative house solely because he knew the house (Senate) would not assent. Subsequently, even though federal courts have ruled the ersatz recess appointments illegal, the appointees continue in office and to oppose the rights of the people. This final action goes even beyond any horrors promulgated by King George III.

  4. The Declaration: "He has erected a multitude of new offices and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and to eat out their substance." President Obama appointed a multitude of unaccountable czars. His administration directed the IRS to harass his political enemies. He is hiring tens of thousands more IRS agents to enforce his dysfunctional and hated health care law. His EPA, NLRB and HHS  have run amok with countless, mind numbing and prolix regulations.

  5. The Declaration: "He has combined with others to subject us to jurisdictions unacknowledged by our laws." He advocates US law and US courts taking into consideration rulings by international and foreign courts. He has supported treaties and protocols (UN Law of the Sea Treaty) that subjugate Americans to the UN, to other international organizations and to foreign laws and governments. 
      Our founding documents list many rights of Americans - but only one duty. The Declaration states the people have a duty: "to throw off such government and to provide new guards for their future security - when a long train of abuses or usurpations evinces a design to reduce them under despotism (autocratic government)."  As shown supra, there already is a long train of abuses under President Barack I.
 
"Barack I is acting just as tyrannical as George III; however, 
George III was an hereditary sovereign monarch of a  foreign
occupying power whereas Barack I is an elected representative
of the American people sworn to uphold the Constitution."
 
     However, the Declaration also wisely states: "All experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they have become accustomed".
 
      Apparently, most Americans believe the evils still are sufferable or they eventually will be mitigated at the ballot box. Finally, as the Declaration also states: "Let facts be submitted to a candid world". To this blogger the facts cited herein demonstrate President Barack I is doing one heck of an impersonation of King George III - only he is an elected representative of the American people sworn to uphold the Constitution and not a hereditary sovereign monarch of a foreign occupying power.
 
       It has been 238 years since the Declaration and we have come full circle to where many of our own president's actions are indistinguishable from those of a British tyrant.
P.O. Box[masked] | Longwood, FL [masked]



Got this as a forward? Sign up to receive our future emails.


powered by emma










--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Scott Cuthbert ([address removed]) from Republican Liberty Caucus of Central East Florida.
To learn more about Scott Cuthbert, visit his/her member profile
To report this message or block the sender, please click here
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | [address removed]

Our Sponsors

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy