add-memberalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbellblockcalendarcamerachatchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-upcircle-with-crosscomposecrossfacebookflagfolderglobegoogleimagesinstagramkeylocation-pinmedalmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1pagepersonpluspollsImported LayersImported LayersImported LayersshieldstartwitterwinbackClosewinbackCompletewinbackDiscountyahoo

Re: [ronpaul-93] Fw: Join the NRA

From: Cameron B.
Sent on: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:21 AM
Two quick notes on this:

1) "to progressively eliminate guns" - fully agreed.  Thats what I was addressing in my previous post/email.  I just think the media is helping to foment the impression that the "Liberal Democrats" are imminently going to "ban our guns", so that when the compromise the esteemed NRA brokers on our behalf, it will just be another step in progressively eliminating guns that most "Conservative Republicans" will be overjoyed at.  Please take a moment to ponder this.  I think if we honestly reflect on this, it is the way it has happened and will continue to happen until enough people wake up to the strategies employed by TPTB.

2) "Liberal Democrats" - the repeated use of this moniker, stereotyping them as if they were a monolith, in my opinion plays into the hands of the very polarizing propaganda you decry.  I know of some "liberal democrats" who are staunchly democrats and also consider themselves "bleeding heart liberals", but are very pro 2nd amendment and own many guns, because they are liberal in terms of defending civil liberties.  I also know some who consider themselves "conservative republicans", but would surrender much of their rights, including restriction of gun rights if it was for the "greater good" as espoused by a Republican in the White House.  Divide and conquer is the strategy.  Don't fall for it!

In Liberty,

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Stephen Newbegin <[address removed]> wrote:
 It is important to understanding the nature of propaganda. We can never overcome this media complex unless we clearly
understand their manipulation. For example, all this emphasis on "assault weapons and large capacity clips" comes with
a shooting of young children in the schools. There was all this hype about an AR-15 type knock off. The reality is he
killed all the children with pistols. His "assault rifle" and shotgun were left locked in the car as being not stealth enough.
So any of the so called current gun control would not have prevented this crime. It is not so much these facts are not being
reported but they are not being hyped because news is a secondary purpose to the large scale propaganda agenda driven media.
This same media makes fun of the NRA for asking for armed guards on campus. How expensive would it be to have silent alarms
in a classroom that is routed electronically back to a central monitoring point that would indicate which classroom a threat has
entered. This could also be automated and broadcast to local dispatch to be there within minutes. The lunatic would not have time
to roam from room to room doing his damage very long. If there was a guard on campus the response could be immediate. Another thing
to notice is if the media finds the killer a Republican, Tea Party or conservative they will report this. However, when it is
a Democrat they do not report this. Notice that they got excited about Colorado because an old fellow with the same name as the killer
was the head of the Tea Party in the area. Notice they thought the shooting of the Democratic Arizona politician was first thought to
be politically motivated until it was found out the boy and his family were liberal Democrats. In fact, the last individual that was
on the right politically to kill a lot of people did it with explosives and the only mass murder to get the death penalty. So notice
none of the killers since Tim McVie  with assault weapons have had their political status revealed. Why? Because they are either Liberal Democrats or the offspring of liberal Democrats. Another interesting take on this focus on the guns rather than the reasons is that Liberal Democrat parents who have difficulty child rearing are more likely to use prescription drugs to control their offspring's behavior while those on the right tend to use clergy, pastors or just tough love as opposed to drugs. So in almost all these recent shootings, prescription mind controlling drugs have been the common thread.  So if they past a law outlawing the sale of guns to all Liberal Democrats with any member of their family on prescription mood changing drugs then none of these mass shootings would have occurred. However, the real purpose is not safety for children but to progressively eliminate guns by the population. Think about it, Obama admitted his focus this term will not be jobs or the economy but social issues such as gun control and immigration reform. He knows that the economy is going down the tubes and having a heavily armed pissed off private citizens wanting to keep their freedom is not consistent with his agenda which inherently will destroy freedom.

---- Leigh Skinner <[address removed]> wrote:

Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Stephen Newbegin ([address removed]) from Ron Paul for President 2012 San Diego County.
To learn more about Stephen Newbegin, visit his/her member profile:
Set my mailing list to email me

As they are sent

In one daily email

Don't send me mailing list messages
Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | [address removed]

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy