February 1, 2012
Macros, baby! Regular syntax admits the possibility of syntactic transformation...to conquer the WORLD!!!!!! (All right, that was a little over-dramatic...)
I have. I've done some investigatory Scheme work as well as a bit of Common Lisp.
Both, actually. I tend to prefer dynamic typing actually; it's the idea of providing the minimal amount of information to a given chunk of code, allowing suitable lower level decisions to be made without breaking expected semantics.
I certainly have.
No answer yet
Long time software guy keeping up with developments.
I always look forward to the next one. What else matters?