addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-leftarrow-right-10x10arrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcredit-cardcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobe--smallglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1languagelaunch-new-window--smalllight-bulblightning-boltlinklocation-pinlockm-swarmSearchmailmediummessagesminusmobilemoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstar-shapestartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahooyoutube

Re: [ljc] Challenges of Managing Virtual/ Remote Software Teams

From: James
Sent on: Monday, April 29, 2013, 11:11 AM
Alex

As others have said, this is hard. It is possible, in some circumstances 

If you can, embed someone with institutional knowledge and culture in your remote location. For virtual teams, start co-located if you can or meet regularly in person if you can't  

In terms of communications, favour high fidelity options (video > voice > text) for discussion and building teams as well as asynchronous persistent repos (wikis work really well).  Talk frequently and be prepared to bear the cost of this (it is far more explicit than in co-located teams).

Decide early how you split work (by component requires shared clarity on the interface, by phase requires an clear statement on roles and responsibilities) and how you will handle issue and conflict resolution

Hope this helps

Regards

James

Sent from my iPhone

On 29 Apr 2013, at 11:01, Martijn Verburg <[address removed]> wrote:

I'd say that it's a *lot* more difficult, but it is possible (several companies such as Atlassian have proven this). Modern technology such as large projector screens showing the other team, shared audio, screen sharing and lots of online collaborative tools can help.

*BUT* At the end of the day it's a Human cultural and communication challenge. Humans tend to be fairly tribal creatures and so most people will always have a closer tie with the people physically in the same office as them, with the shared local culture, language, values, humour etc.

You can get a good baseline shared across remote locations, but everyone has to work a little harder to make that happen (and occasional F2F gatherings are still vital).

Cheers,
Martijn


On 29 April[masked]:51, @sleepyfox <[address removed]> wrote:

You can't.

Fox.

On 29 Apr[masked]:39, "alexander sharma" <[address removed]> wrote:
Hi

I wanted to ask what your thoughts are on managing virtual/remote software teams and what the best way is to manage virtual teams (use of tools screensharing etc).

Thank you




--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by alexander sharma ([address removed]) from LJC - London Java Community.
To learn more about alexander sharma, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | [address removed]




--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by @sleepyfox ([address removed]) from LJC - London Java Community.
To learn more about @sleepyfox, visit his/her member profile





--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Martijn Verburg ([address removed]) from LJC - London Java Community.
To learn more about Martijn Verburg, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, POB 4668 #37895 NY NY USA 10163 | [address removed]

People in this
group are also in: