From: | user 7. |
Sent on: | Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 7:10 PM |
I hate this stuff- it's
time for everyone to be recognized by their abilities not their
"disabilities." Truthfully, I'm not crazy about the term disabled,
but it beats some older, more offensive words. My daughter was working for her
masters in deaf education and it seems that the deaf are the only population
who considers it a culture rather than a disability. I'm not sure it will ever
happen, but I'd like to see if I can help make things better. I play piano every
week for the Wounded Warriors over at Fort Sam. It's not much, but I enjoy it
and they seem to like it. How about a term like "differently abled?"
If no one could see, the blind would be common. Many people seem
"abled" but have problems that we can't see. We're all working on our
lives, making the most of what we have. Who cares what you can't do as long as
you have the opportunity to join others? It's what you can do that counts.
Okay, I'm getting off my band wagon now. Oops, tripped. Anyway, let me know if
I can do anything- preferably from my house because we're dealing with a bunch
of health issues this year. -Rhoda
From: [address removed] [mailto:[address removed]] On Behalf
Of Robert
Sent: Wednesday, December 16,[masked]:44 PM
To: [address removed]
Subject: Re: [art-272] First Thurs & First Fri. Invitation
Dear
Simon,
In
Business School they often reminded us that the
law
is the "moral minimum" for corporate behavior.
Companies
that have a conscience usually go far
beyond
the minumum to serve and protect the
public
they conduct business with.
Same
with the ADA, it is the bare minumum requirements.
For
an intitution to hide behind it like a shield is
reprehensible
and far from the purpose of the legislation.
I
had spoken with Goodwill Industriesof S.A. to collaborate
on
an initiative to encourage the disabled to exhibit
their
artwork. Unfortunately the most passionate advocate
of
this idea just left the company. Now I have three voicemails
into
their replacement and no response as of yet.
I
am willing to offer my time and a large location that
is
accessable, but organizations that get paid millions to serve
the
disabled need to get off their tail and get involved too.
Willing
but frustrated,
Robert
From: Simon Booth <[address removed]>
To: [address removed]
Sent: Tue, December 15,[masked]:21:49 AM
Subject: Re: [art-272] First Thurs & First Fri. Invitation
Sorry about the delay in responding-
On Nov 12, 2009, at 6:59 AM, Robert wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> As a disabled vet I understand your concerns. The family
> that owns the property has not adequately invested in serving
> the community's accessibilities needs. Their new buldings do,
> but those of us in the back row just have steps.
That entire section of the complex seems to be like that, although a
couple of galleries do have ramps. Has anyone else with a
disability brought up the lack of wheelchair access? I ask because
in the almost 17 years I've been using a wheelchair one of the more
frustrating things I've encountered is a certain number of disabled
persons who seem to be more hostile to their fellow disabled persons
in regards to things like ADA and accessibility. This is the
first
time in years that I've been confident enough to even discuss openly
access problems, so I really appreciate the fact that people really
are concerned about making the gallery more wheelchair-friendly.
I'd like to see more wheelchair users at events like First Friday-
over the years it seems like while other disabilities are becoming
more accepted, the wheelchair users seem to have become much less
visible. Nowadays I go out someplace and I'm the only wheelchair
user, and even VIAtrans seems much less accommodating when
transporting wheelchair users or others with physical disabilities
compared with how reliable the service seems to serve those with
developmental or cognitive disabilities. I get more dirty looks
these days sometimes than I did a long time ago when I use a ramp, a
handicapped parking spot (using my manual chair when riding with
family or friends in their vehicles) or even just wheeling around in
public.
From an art standpoint, am I out of line in thinking there should be
more disabled persons in the art community? Not disabled persons
creating *only* disability-themed art in a segregated group, but
people like myself who happen to be disabled but would like to see
other disabled artists being encouraged to get out and be part of the
larger local art community.
>
> Since the older section is coded residential it could be some time
> before Lifshultz alters that area. As you know, ADA compliance
> is less stringent for R-coded residences.
That's been a gripe of mine about ADA- lots of exemptions, like
residential vs. "business" space, or the age of the building or
space
in question. I've actually had people quote ADA to rationalize not
complying with it. And that's compounded by a small faction of
disabled persons who seem to oppose the rest of the disability
community being able to do things that "normal people" do (I
say
"normal" in a sarcastic manner ;-) ).
One dirty little secret about advocates for "independent living"
for
disabled persons is that in a roundabout away higher-functioning
wheelchair users are excluded because while there's housing
assistance and help for people mental disabilities or physical
limitations but not using a wheelchair, wheelchairs users run afoul
of ADA being waved around to justify the lack of accessible
apartments in the city- anything that would allow a wheelchair user
to live in a particular apartment is suddenly going beyond
"reasonable accommodation".
> We do not have public
> hours and operate by invitation and appointment only for that
> reason.
Is there a way to promote the need for better wheelchair access at
galleries that doesn't immediately get misinterpreted as one guy in a
wheelchair trying to scam special treatment? That's the big reason
I've been reluctant to be involved with advocacy or promoting
disability awareness- last time I did that, back in the early 90s, I
came close to facing legal action and a fraud charge that only was
withdrawn when I promised to stop associating with the disability
community and self-identifying as disabled. I even had to downplay
the visibility of my wheelchair in the video projects my friends and
I were producing at the time.
More recently though I'm finding that there are people asking the
same questions I am, and really wanting to *do* something that's not
just getting angry but not accomplishing anything.
>
> If you would like to schedule a time with the gallery I would
> be happy to work with any assitance provider you have to
> do my best to ensure you can enjoy the opportunity to see
> the art.
That would be great- while I can't get into the gallery with my
motorized wheelchair, I think I might be able to come by with my
manual chair and have a friend with me, so I can transfer and pull
myself up the steps, then have my chair at the top of the steps
waiting for me, so I can transfer back into it.
I'll let you know when I might be interested in coming by.
Again, I really do appreciate the concern and real interest in making
the gallery more accessible.
Simon
--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to
everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
http://www.meetup.com/SA-Artists/
This message was sent by Simon Booth ([address removed])
from SA Artists.
To learn more about Simon Booth, visit his/her member profile: http://www.meetup.com/SA-Artists/members/5666159/
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here: http://www.meetup.com/account/comm/
Meetup Inc. PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]
--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will
be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Robert ([address removed]) from SA Artists.
To learn more about Robert, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here
Meetup Inc. PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] |
[address removed]