addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcredit-cardcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobe--smallglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1launch-new-window--smalllight-bulblinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

We Are Change Boston /Boston Alternative Media- Journalism Message Board Boston 9/11 Truth Discussion Forum › Science & Society - 9/11 the best lecture about the irrefutable evidence

Science & Society - 9/11 the best lecture about the irrefutable evidence

A former member
Post #: 1,871
Here is the best lecture about why we need a new investigation of the events connected to the mass murder on 9/11.­
and see part seven of Dr. Jones’ lecture on this subject of nano-thermate­

911 Dr Steven E. Jones - Science and Society - part 2 of 8 as of Apr 22, 2011­­­­­­­­

How did the surface temperatures of the World Trade Center wreckage get up to 1,200 degrees F. noted 21 days after the collapse? Answer: Something even hotter was radiating this heat to the surface of the wreckage. And we know from eyewitness accounts that molten steel was seen inside the pile of 9/11 wreckage. And fire fighters reported that their boots were melting. So the steel was not red not on which they were walking, but it was damn hot, like walking on a hot wood stove. You know the old stoves you may have seen into which you have to put wood to cook you food. And of course these iron stoves did not get red hot or melt - did they?

When NIST did a computer simulation of the collapse of World Trade Center seven, NIST used thermo conductivity of zero. Therefore, their modeling of the collapse violated that laws of physics. What is thermo conductivity?

Well, if you put a steel pot on a red hot stove burner, the steel gets hot as the heat moves thru the whole steel pot. So why in the hell would NIST’s structural engineer’s use such false and crazy model and leave out thermo conductivity in making their computer model to help them analyze what caused the collapse?

Heat moves thru metals and is released into the air as it cools. For example, a woman was seen waving in the impact area of the south Tower before it fell down. That is the steel she was standing on had cooled after the explosion of the jet fuel and office fire.

“Thermo conductivity is what your steel pan on a stove, cools off after you remove it from the red hot burner. And the same thing happens when the fire in a building moves in search of more stuff to burn, those steel beams left behind cool off. Correct?
Damn right.

Dick Cheney put a lot of pressure on BYU to force them to shut up Dr. Steven Jones and he was put on administrative leave for publishing his research about nano-thermate from the WTC dust. In April of 2009, he and his colleagues publish a research paper in the Open Chemical Physics Journal of their experiments. BYU promoted Dr. Jones to Emeritus Professor, yet as he was forced into early retirement in January 2007. This action hurt him and his family financially.
A new poll shows 25 percent of Americans believe that the government knew about 9/11 in advance.
as of January 17, 2013: Fairleigh Dickinson University poll

Architect Ron Avery explains why explosives collapsed the Twin Tower­

See photo at: http://how911wasdone....­
There are two things to notice in this photo. First, in the descending dust cloud can be see yellowish colors. This can only be caused flashes made by hot pieces of steel or the light given of by explosives fire/energy flashes. Second, notice at the top floors of the south Tower of the World Trade Center has tipped some 22 degrees. This whole top section is connected together with inter connected steel beams. Gravity should have caused this top section to continue to fall to the left and NOT have fallen within the building’s foot print as it did.

If you search google you can find a video tape of south Tower collapsing. You will notice that the lower floors do not move. What you see is the top floor melt away, like a cube of button on a hot pan. Melt from the bottom as gravity pulls, explosion destroy this cube from the bottom up.

Here are links to better photos of the outer wall and columns. I suspect the weight of the upper floors buckled these pillers in a direction due to chance, or in vs. our, or right vs left.­­
in the following photos notice the ** flash **of an explosion that some call a photo of the fire, but notice the black smoke cloud from the diesel fuel fire, it has been burning already before the flash. The flash could be a gasoline or propane explosion, but most likely it was cordite explosion that people smelled afterwards. Another reason I think it was an flash from an explosion is you will notices the flash is being reflected in the fog-like smoke.­

Too many coincidences on 9/11 regarding war games parts 1 to 3


9/11 - More evidence of two or more explosions at the Pentagon in addition to no 757 crashing into it.

How hard was it to fly into the Pentagon with a 757 at 20 feet above the ground? -impossible­

A summary of Peter Dale Scott's essay:
CIA conclusively withheld information from the FBI about the terrorist threat and more links to the Israelis and Saudis in to 9/11 with my additional research.

Powered by mvnForum

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy