ADS & AMDS Webinar | COVID-19 and the Media
Details
Amsterdam Data Science (ADS) and Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS) are co-hosting a new lecture series in collaboration with Elsevier and Google to explore ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ช๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ข๐ฉ๐๐-๐ญ๐ต.
Aims:
- Showcase the power and limitations of data centred approaches
- Jointly understand and learn from the different COVID approaches and views
- Shape the time for Data Science research/education after the lock-down
๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฒ: ๐๐ข๐ฉ๐๐-๐ญ๐ต ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ
After recent critics on science support for policy making, e.g. in sustainability, COVID-19 shows how society relies on scientific experts and doctors with all its challenges to translate scientific knowledge into public perception and policy making.
๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ
12:00 Introduction & Welcome
12:05 Talk #1: Truth in Science, Politics and Media. Triangle or Trinity?
12:20 Q&A
12:30 Talk #2: Consensus and misinformation in the process of COVID-19 sensemaking.
12:50 Q&A
13:00 End!
๐ ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐
Marc Salomon (ABS UvA, ADS)
๐ง๐ฎ๐น๐ธ #๐ญ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐น ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฟ
Dr. Marcel Becker (1961) studied history and philosophy at Radboud University Nijmegen. He finished his dissertation about ethics of war and peace in 1997. Since then he is associate professor applied ethics at the Radboud University. He has written books on the ethics of public administration and digital ethics, and is working on a book on judicial ethics. Personal site: www.Marcel-Becker.com
Title: Truth in Science, Politics and Media. Triangle or Trinity?
Scientists are convinced that their expertise should play an important role in policy, and this is indeed often the case. But politicians and other lay-people sometimes seem to live in a different world, where other considerations than โtruth-seekingโ play a role. This tension is aggravated by social media that contribute to the โblurring of boundariesโ. Is it necessary for scientists to require extra communication skills and work more carefully on their presentation in the media? Does the scientist have any responsibility in the rebuttal of fake news?
๐ง๐ฎ๐น๐ธ #๐ฎ ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐บ๐ถ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ฒ ๐ฉ. ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ฟ
Emillie V de Keulenaar, a PhD researcher at UvAโs Open Intelligence and SFUโs Digital Democracies groups. She has previously researched with the UNโs Innovation Cell, the Dutch digital humanities cluster CLARIAH, the European Time Machine consortium and the Clingendael Institute. Her interests lie in the effects of online conflicts in usersโ understanding of politically contrary information, as well as the history of online hate and counter-speech.
Title: Consensus and misinformation in the process of COVID-19 sensemaking.
Emillieโs presentation discusses the relation between poor public consensus and COVID-19 misinformation, as well as the role of governments, public health organisations and social media platforms in moderating usersโ access to COVID-19 misinformation.
Date: 9 September 2020
Time: 12:00-13:00
