Skip to content

Details

In an age where free speech and democratic pluralism are core values, societies face a recurring dilemma: how far should tolerance go? Can a democracy remain open and inclusive if it allows those who seek to destroy openness itself to thrive within it?

The philosopher Karl Popper warned that “unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance.” Yet this warning has become increasingly real. Across Europe and beyond, extremist movements, hate groups, and disinformation networks exploit freedoms of expression and association to undermine the very democratic norms that protect them. When such groups are restricted, however, governments are accused of censorship, repression, or elitism — feeding the same populist narratives they seek to contain.

From the rise of far-right parties in Europe, to social media bans on extremist voices, to state crackdowns that blur the line between fighting hate and policing dissent — the question remains: where is the limit of tolerance? Should democracies draw a firm line to protect themselves, or is true freedom the willingness to tolerate even those who despise it?

This evening’s debate invites participants to explore the tension between liberty and survival, between open dialogue and necessary boundaries. Is the suppression of intolerant ideologies a betrayal of democratic principles — or their ultimate defense?

This debate will follow a British Parliamentary format with eight debaters split into four teams of two.

Participants who wish to speak are highly encouraged to bring a paper and pen. You are welcome to participate even if you have no prior debating experience.

We aim for debates that are respectful, constructive, and welcoming:

  • Respect ideas and people Listen actively, stay quiet while others speak, and debate arguments, not identities or beliefs.
  • Be concise and civil Keep questions short and relevant; avoid hostility, hate speech, or discrimination.
  • Respect boundaries and time No unwanted advances or suggestive behavior; arrive on time to avoid disrupting the debate.
  • Follow moderators They guide the discussion and ensure fairness.

Members are also interested in