Art and morals

Art moves us, inspires us, entertains us, and sometimes divides us. But what happens when the people behind the art become controversial? When an artist’s words, actions, or beliefs clash with our own values, does that change how we experience their work?

In this debate, we’ll explore the uneasy relationship between creative work and its creator. Should art be judged on its own merits, or does consuming it also mean endorsing the person behind it? Where do we draw the line between appreciation, accountability, and personal values? Including in, but not limited to, the #MeToo context…

As always, bring your opinions, your doubts, and your willingness to listen — this debate is about questioning assumptions, exploring grey areas, and engaging respectfully with different perspectives.

⚠️ Trigger warning:

This debate may touch on sensitive topics, including cases of sexual assault. We aim to keep the discussion thoughtful, respectful, and focused on ideas rather than individuals. We have zero tolerance for harmful, dismissive, or disrespectful language. Please take care of yourself, and feel free to step out or reach out to the organisers at any point if you need support._

This debate will follow a British Parliamentary format with eight debaters split into four teams of two.

Participants who wish to speak are highly encouraged to bring a paper and pen. You are welcome to participate even if you have no prior debating experience.

⚠️ Disclaimer:

We aim for debates that are respectful, constructive, and welcoming.

• Respect ideas and people: Listen actively, stay quiet while others speak, and debate arguments, not identities or beliefs.

• Be concise and civil: Keep questions short and relevant; avoid hostility, hate speech, or discrimination.

• Respect boundaries and time: No unwanted advances or suggestive behavior; arrive on time to avoid disrupting the debate.

• Follow moderators: They guide the discussion and ensure fairness.

Looking forward to seeing you there 😊