addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

Re: [humanism-174] Rejection of scientific evidence because of dogma

From: Tim C.
Sent on: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 5:25 PM
In a message dated 12/4/2012 5:16:18 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [address removed] writes:
I just don't want to believe a human can be that deluded. Perhaps the people funding them do so to further the scientific and logical agenda. This has GOT to be intentional.


 
Ah. No, nuef.  I've been familiar with Ham and his AIG for several years now and they are 100% dead-balls serious about their literal biblical beliefs.  100%.  They raised more than $35 million dollars for the express purpose of building their ridiculous Creation Museum, and they have hired fundaloons who have worked to earn legitimate degrees in science specifically so they could deny those sciences.  They put out literature and they give talks etc etc etc. They may BE a joke, but they are not joking!  You can visit their wesbiste, but also take a look at noanswersingenesis.com for some fun refutations as well as summaries of their nonsense.
Tim
 

Our Sponsors

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy