Connections Humanist Community

In the lead-up to the next presidential administration, the Heritage Foundation and dozens of conservative organizations have launched Project 2025, a comprehensive effort to reshape the federal government. The initiative outlines sweeping reforms to government agencies, public policies, and leadership priorities with the stated goal of reducing the size of the federal bureaucracy, restoring individual liberties, and promoting a particular vision of American values.

For some, Project 2025 represents a bold effort to return to what they see as the founding principles of the United States. For others, it raises concerns about the balance of power, individual rights, and the role of government in protecting vulnerable communities.

This event will explore Project 2025’s core objectives, including:

• Limiting federal regulatory power and promoting local governance.
• Restructuring social policies with a focus on family, religious freedom, and national sovereignty.
• Reforming economic, environmental, and foreign policies according to a conservative framework.

But we’ll also ask the broader questions:

• Where are we now as a nation in terms of balancing freedom, safety, and opportunity?
• How can we create a system of governance that empowers citizens without unnecessary harm?
• What ethical principles should guide both conservative and liberal efforts to shape the future?

Whether you agree with Project 2025 or oppose its aims, this conversation invites people across the political spectrum to engage thoughtfully, understand each other’s perspectives, and discuss the future of American leadership and values.

Format: Lecture and discussion

Note: social time for our community 15 minutes before the presentation.

The justice system is meant to be the great equalizer, protecting our rights and upholding the law. But is it truly just for all Americans today? In this thoughtful and personal conversation, we’ll explore the core questions surrounding our courts:

• How are judges and justices appointed, and how does that influence their decisions?
• What role, if any, does undisclosed (“dark”) money play in shaping judicial rulings?
• Why is public trust in the courts declining—and how can we rebuild it?
• What are some personal stories that reveal both the strengths and shortcomings of our current legal system?
• If our system isn’t perfect (and no system is), what reforms could make it fairer and more accountable—such as community courts or citizen juries?

Our goal is not to tear down the justice system but to improve it thoughtfully—protecting its essential role in society while correcting the ways it falls short of fairness. We’ll also discuss innovative ideas like local community courts and explore how ordinary citizens can help create a more just and trustworthy legal system.
Whether you’re a skeptic or a supporter of the courts, conservative or liberal, your voice matters in this conversation about how we define justice in America today—and tomorrow.

Format: Lecture and discussion

Note: social time for our community 15 minutes before the presentation.

Few economic debates are as long-standing—or as heated—as the question of whether tax cuts truly boost economic growth. Proponents of “trickle-down” economics argue that lowering taxes on businesses and the wealthy spurs investment, job creation, and prosperity for all. Others contend that putting more money directly into the hands of working families—what some call “trickle-up” economics—creates stronger and more sustainable growth.
But what does the evidence actually say? And how much of this debate is driven by data versus ideology?

In this session, we’ll explore:

• Historical examples of major tax cuts and their long-term economic impacts.
• Whether cutting taxes on the wealthy, middle class, or businesses has created growth—or simply widened inequality.
• Alternative models for boosting economic opportunity, including demand-side and supply-side strategies.
• How to interpret competing economic studies—and why economists often disagree.

This is not a debate about left vs. right, but about understanding what works best for the economy—and for people across all income levels.
Whether you believe in trickle-down, trickle-up, or something in between, this event invites you to explore the evidence, challenge your assumptions, and imagine a stronger economy for all Americans.

Format: Lecture and discussion

Note: social time for our community 15 minutes before the presentation.

The “God of the Gaps” argument—claiming that God explains what science cannot—has long been criticized for shrinking as human knowledge expands. But what if there’s a more nuanced version of this argument? One not rooted in ignorance, but in the fundamental limits of human understanding itself.

Enter Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, which mathematically prove that within any consistent system of logic, there will always be true statements that cannot be proven within that system. Does this open the door to a rational acknowledgment of mysteries that may remain permanently beyond human explanation—whether those mysteries point to God, the transcendent, or simply the limits of reason?

In this session, we’ll explore:

What Gödel’s theorems actually say—and don’t say—about the limits of human knowledge.

Whether the “God of the Gaps” argument, when reframed as an acknowledgment of intrinsic limits rather than temporary ignorance, holds any philosophical merit.

Alternative secular explanations for the unknown, such as human cognitive limits, multiverse theories, or epistemological humility.

How this question intersects with science, philosophy, and personal belief systems across the spectrum.

This conversation is for skeptics, believers, and anyone intrigued by the boundaries of what we can know. It’s less about proving or disproving God, and more about asking: When we reach the edges of knowledge, what—if anything—should we place there?

Format: Lecture and discussion

Note: social time for our community 15 minutes before the presentation.