addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-leftarrow-right-10x10arrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcredit-cardcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobe--smallglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1languagelaunch-new-window--smalllight-bulblinklocation-pinlockm-swarmSearchmailmediummessagesminusmobilemoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahooyoutube

FYI---"Gov't Offices are Vacant"- All Gov't Officials are "Private Contractors" | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Revolution

De : Steve D.
Envoyé le : mercredi 17 octobre 2012 12:00


IMPORTANT to those who "WONDER"?


Subject: FW: HUGE: Rod Class gets FOURTH Administrative Ruling "Gov't Offices are Vacant"- All Gov't Officials are "Private Contractors" | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Revolution
Date: Mon, 15 Oct[masked]:37:25 -0700

Be sure and View Join the Complaint in highlighted Yellow Complaint with GUILTY Verdicts and Fines agianst IRS Agents and Judges

Date: Mon, 15 Oct[masked]:46:52 -0700
From: [address removed]
Subject: fw: HUGE: Rod Class gets FOURTH Administrative Ruling "Gov't Offices are Vacant"- All Gov't Officials are "Private Contractors" | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Revolution
To: [address removed]

October 15, 2012
Hi, All,
Court rules govt offices are vacated.
Govt run by private contractors.

Holy Moses....the TRUTH....finally comes out what pro se litigators and patriotic law researchers have suspected....much of govt has been privatized.
This gives you STRONGER legal status and protection when they attempt to apply their private, copyrighted rules, codes, and ordinances to YOU.
Here are a couple points from the link below.
Suggest printing out the article, and pass along far and wide.
15. If the State demands you have a Drivers License and Tag for your vehicle because it is registered with the State, then as the owner of the vehicle, the State is required to pay for the vehicle, the tags, licensing, fuel, tires, oil, etc. and they are also to pay you a salary for driving a State owned vehicle; it says so in their own Highway Safety Act and USC - CFR rules and regulations.
16. We now have the court orders that goes back and nullifies any and all IRS and Tax cases, Foreclosures, Credit Card Debt, cases or actions. These people never had the lawful right to demand anything of you; they are corporate actors, not a legitimate government body.
More here....print out....pass along far and wide:
The IRS and U.S. Govt are both listed by  as private companies.                  
Who owns them?
And why are Americans virtual indentured servants it seems to private companies?      
Type in the search box the name and location of any Internal Revenue Service or United States Government local office.  Here are the national offices:

Search your Secretary of State’s records for IRS.  It is either not registered to do business in the state, or registered as a private company, maybe with stockholders listed.
How govt has been privatized:
Defacto Government Scam (e-book)
(Defacto means lawful by appearance only,
but really illegitimate, illegal)

How to create an honest government
The Great IRS Hoax:  Why You Don't Owe an Income Tax
Suggest downloading this for safekeeping.
Why You Dont' Owe Income Tax (e-book)
Click on the red link a few paragraphs down
Must read book by federal tax expert, paralegal,
Bill Conklin who has won 8 tax cases against IRS
per his website
Man wins hung jury on tax case
You can see that in spite of every effort of the judge and prosecutor to deprive the defendant in the tax crime case of due process, the jury saw through the government smoke and hung.  So, no conviction, in spite of 28 government witnesses.  Why?  None could testify that the tax code applied to the defendant.
 Bob Hurt
Subscribe to free law newsletter 
IRS/DOJ dismiss tax case against man
IRS guilty of fraud
Scroll to page ten, Larry Becraft Wins Landmark Case
to read about Lloyd Long acquittal for not filing
IRS employee testifies that there is a secret IRS computer file
that showed Long was not required to file.
IRS/DOJ decline to rebut Long's statement that he could
find no law requiring filling
Ton of valuable information
Tools for            
 Tax reduction methods                                                                      

Rebuttal to IRS Frivolous Arguments pamphlet

>>  Movie:  American:  Freedom to Fascism 
 ( Expose’ of IRS and Federal Reserve)                                            Director’s version                    or
Master website for taxation research sources:

Exhibits downloadable to include in response letters and court cases:
Remove wage levies                  

>>>> Tools for Justice:  must hear video, click on the links about the income tax.
New tax case discovered.  No income tax withholding legally applies to Americans (govt employees excepted)     
Former IRS Investigator acquitted on tax case
Former IRS supervisor testifies he knows of no law requiring
Joe Bannister to file a 1040 form

Joe Bannister’s video interview:  see other videos on the right
Joe Bannister's home page                    

Free copy of Chapter One of Joe's book    Suggest ordering full book for reliance defense.                    I copy of the book can be included as supporting document in a reply letter.
Lawyer acquitted on tax case for not fililng
Tom Cyer's website
No law requires filling
Reporting and Withholding e-course
Learn about your rights at these related sites:
Pre-written letters
Tax help
Join state lawsuits

Trade and Business Scam (W4 and W9 scheme exposed) e-book


W2 and W9 Scheme

The Constitution prohibits a direct tax on we the people unless apportioned per capita, equalling, the same amount on every person.  So how does IRS and Congress get around this??

Here the IRS admits that there is no law requiring an individual to file a 1040.

 See page two.

“This screen shot from the IRS website in 2008, Indicates that private employers are not required to enter into payroll withholding agreements.  After prominently posting this section on our website for over two years, the IRS conveniently removed it on[masked] as well as any mention at all of "private employers" from their IRM. Covering up the truth!”

Internal Revenue Code is private, special law for those who consent to participate.                          Once consenting, one must strictly follow all the regulations.
FW:  newsletter below
Paycheck Piracy does not accept any liability or responsibility for
the information provided by others. It is your duty to verify the
accuracy and the legality of any information accessed via the
Please note: This message was sent from an auto-notification system
that cannot accept incoming e-mails. Please do not reply to this
Paycheck Piracy:
- Does not rent, sell, use or abuse the list of subscribers.
- Does not insert any ads nor pop-ups into your message.
- Does not send HTML email ('tracking' messages with different colors,
   fancy fonts, or pictures).
- Does not track whether subscribers opened their email (requires HTML
The Truth about Income Taxes in Plain English
If you value truth, honesty and fairness in government, if you do
not want to be lied to by the IRS, if you want to see your children
and their children live in a Nation free from fraud within the
highest levels of government, I plead with you to read this eBook
and spread the knowledge to as many people as you can.
Neither Congress nor the IRS will change our tax system until the
People demand it. The People will not demand it until they are
certain that what they have been told is a lie. The 35 years of
research packed into this eBook will demonstrate beyond any doubt
that the Truth about Income Taxes simply does not lie in the mouths
of the IRS, the Congress or the courts

If you like what we do, please help us do more.
Paypal gift address: [address removed] or snail mail (send
cash, checks or money orders to): Paycheck Piracy c/o 3605 Long
Beach Blvd, Ste 327 Long Beach, Calif. state
Subscribe to the free e-letter, [address removed]
No law compels a private-sector non-governmentally-privileged work eligible man or woman to submit a form W-4 or W-9 (or their equivalents), nor to obtain or disclose an SSN as a condition of being hired or keeping one's job.  With the exception of an order from a court of competent jurisdiction issued by a duly qualified judge, no amounts can be lawfully taken from one's pay (for taxes, fees or other charges) without the worker's explicit, intentional, knowing, voluntary, written consent.
This is a one-way announcement list. Only the list moderators are able to post a message.
To subscribe: <mailto:[address removed]>
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[address removed]>
Free archived files:

Court Rulings Relating To Income Taxes                                                                      


The Supreme Court has said,

"Keeping in mind the well-settled rule that the citizen is exempt from taxation unless the same is imposed by clear and unequivocal language, and that where the construction of a tax law is doubtful, the doubt is to be resolved in favor of those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid"      

192 U.S. 397, p-416, 1904,


In the case of Lucas v. Earl, [1930] 281 U.S. 111, the U.S. Supreme Court stated unambiguously that:

"The claim that salaries, wages and compensation for personal services are to be taxed as an entirety and therefore must be returned by the individual who has performed the services which produced the gain is without support either in the language of the Act or in the decisions of the courts construing it.  Not only this, but it is directly opposed to provisions of the Act and to regulations of the U.S. Treasury Dept. which either prescribe or permit that compensation for personal services be not taxed as an entirety and be not returned by the individual performing the services. It is to be noted that by the language of the Act it is not salaries, wages or compensation for personal services that are to be included in gross income. That which is to be included is gains, profits and income DERIVED from salaries, wages or compensation for personal service." [Emphasis added]


 The Court ruled similarly in Goodrich v. Edwards, [1921] 255 U.S. 527 and in 1969, the Court ruled in Conner v. U.S., 303 F.Supp. 1187, that:  "Whatever may constitute income, therefore must have the essential feature of gain to the recipient. This was true when the 16th Amendment became effective, it was true at the time of Eisner v. Macomber, supra, it was true under sect. 22(a) of the Internal  Revenue Code of 1938, and it is likewise true under sect. 61(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. If there is not gain, there is not income .... Congress has taxed INCOME and not compensation."

"... one does not derive income by rendering services and charging for them.” Edwards v. Keith, [1916] 231 F. 111

No direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548,[masked])

Even at the state level, we find courts following the lead of the U.S. Supreme Court:

 "There is a clear distinction between profit and wages or compensation for labor. Compensation for labor cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law.” Oliver v. Halstead, [1955] 196 Va. 992, 86 S.E.2d 858

"Reasonable compensation for labor or services rendered in not profit                           Lauderdale Cemetery Assoc. v. Matthew 345 Pa. 239, 47 A.2d. 277, 280 [1946]

BOATHE v. TERRY, 713 F.2d 1405, at 1414 (1983) “The taxpayer must be liable for the tax. The liability is a condition precedent to the demand. Merely demanding payment, even repeatedly, does not cause liability.”

The OMB Document Control number assigned to Form 1040 is[masked]. (You can find the OMB Document Control number in the upper right hand corner of any Form 1040.) According to the law, and the I.R.S.'s own filings with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), “Form 1040 is NOT required from citizens  to report their own income.”

“Therefore, there was no authority to assess  Plaintiff. Substitute returns such as those typically filed by the IRS when a 1040 return has not been filed " no return at all." (Vaira v. C.I.R., 444 F.2d, citing Dixon v. Commissioner, 28 T.C. 388); and that, "Since the 'returns' prepared by the IRS contained no information from which a tax could be determined, they were not returns" (U.S. v. Verkuilen, 82-2 U.S.T.C., Schiff v. Commissioner, U.S.T.C. [masked]).

On 6331; Purpose - "This section was enacted to subject salaries of federal employees to same collection procedures as are available against all other taxpayers, including employees of a state." Sims v U.S, W. Va. 1959, 79 S. Ct. 641, 359 US 108, and 3 L. Ed. 2d 667.


No law requires a worker to file a Form W-4 (or its equivalent). In U.S. v. Mobil Oil Co., 82-1 USTC para. 9242, U.S.D.C. ND Tex. Dallas 1981 CA. [masked]-G, the court ruled that “an Entity does not even have to send a W-4 Form or other employment forms to the Internal Revenue Service unless served with a judicial court-ordered summons to do so.”

Internal Revenue Manual  [masked]  [masked]) Payroll Deduction Agreements:  Private employers, states, and political subdivisions are not required to enter into payroll deduction agreements. Taxpayers should determine whether their employers will accept and process executed agreements before agreements are submitted for approval or finalized.

The income tax is not a tax on income as such. It is an Excise Tax with respect to Certain Activities and Privileges which is measured by reference to the income which they produce. The income is not the subject of the tax; it is the basis for determining the amount of tax. House Congressional Records, page 2580, March 27, 1943.

“Only the rare taxpayer would be likely to know that he could refuse to produce his records to the IRS agents… Who would believe the ironic truth that the cooperative taxpayer fares much worse than the individual who relies upon his constitutional rights.” US v Dickerson, 413 F.2d 1111, (1969).



Sharing useful/interesting information for peaceful solutions and a better society.





Les membres de ce
groupe sont aussi dans :


Membres Meetup, connectez-vous

En cliquant sur « S'inscrire » ou « S'inscrire via Facebook », vous confirmez accepter nos Conditions d'utilisation et notre Politique de confidentialité