Sat, Dec 6 · 11:00 AM EST
The Humanist Association of Toronto
http://www.humanisttoronto.ca/
Every Saturday we meet on Zoom to discuss a topic decided upon the previous week. These are topics of humanist interest, from a humanist perspective.
The topic of the discussion will be decided in a prior meeting, usually two weeks in advance. This week’s topic is: From Structural Narcissism to Humanist Ethics: A Dec 6 Reflection , Introduced by Brenda Sedgwick
Why Dec 6 Matters
December 6 marks the anniversary of the 1989 École Polytechnique massacre. It is a National Day of Remembrance for gender-based violence. The event is an extreme expression of a continuum of structural violence —from everyday dismissal and bureaucratic devaluation to explicit misogynistic harm.
***
Two Opposing Ethical Poles: Narcissism vs Humanism
1. Narcissistic / Dark Triad Orientation
Linked to exploitation, domination, and suppression of vulnerability. This includes:
Narcissism: entitlement, lack of empathy
Machiavellianism: manipulation, strategic deception
Psychopathy: callousness, remorselessness
Structural equivalents (Weber, Goffman, Fromm, Mills):
bureaucratic defensiveness
rigid hierarchies
image-protective cultures
institutional blame-shifting
Results: Grooming, scapegoating, silencing dissent, rewarding control over care.
***
2. Humanist / Light Triad Orientation
The psychological and ethical counterpoint to narcissism. This includes:
Humanism: inherent worth of each person
Faith in Humanity: a belief in others' goodness
Kantianism: treating people as ends, not means
Structural equivalents:
cultures of repair, humility, and accountability
reciprocal responsibility
truth-telling and transparency
relational rather than hierarchical ethics
Results: Attunement, collaboration, restoration, shared dignity.
***
Micro–Meso–Macro Lens
Micro (Individual): interpersonal grooming, idealization, gaslighting, devaluation.
Meso (Organization): bureaucratic rigidity, “iron cage,” institutional deflection, para-military “never admit error” cultures.
Macro (Society): gendered violence, patriarchy, status hierarchies, systemic devaluation of marginalized voices.
Humanist ethics intervene at all three levels.
***
Red Flags and Double-Bind
Citizens and survivors are asked to identify danger signs:
charm that feels too fast
contradictory behaviour
refusals to accept responsibility
emotional coldness or hostility
silencing, dismissing, or pathologizing concerns
Yet when individuals identify these patterns in institutions, they are often labelled “difficult,” “unstable,” or “fixated.” This is a structural double-bind.
***
Guiding Questions for Discussion
Continuum of Harm
How do everyday bureaucratic behaviours connect to extreme gender-based violence?
2. Structure vs Ethics
Where do narcissistic patterns show up in institutions, and how might humanist values counteract them?
3. The Pathologizing of Witnessing
Why are those who identify harm so often dismissed?
4. Humanist Cultures of Repair
What structural changes would reflect true humanist ethics?
Meet our diverse group, trade perspectives in a free and open forum and learn from others as they learn from you!
BTW: don't be concerned if there are not many RSVP’s. Many HAT members attend regularly but don’t sign up on Meetup. Our online meetings have been very popular with 20-30 attendees.
NOTE: The HAT Forum adheres strictly to the City of Toronto Policy on Non-Discrimination (http://www.the519.org/public/content/policy-files/The519SpaceUsePolicy.pdf)
Our Website (http://www.humanisttoronto.ca/)