Skip to content

Details

The Humanist Association of Toronto
http://www.humanisttoronto.ca/

Every Saturday we meet on Zoom to discuss a topic decided upon the previous week. These are topics of humanist interest, from a humanist perspective.

The topic of the discussion will be decided in a prior meeting, usually two weeks in advance. This week’s topic is: The Marginalization of the Poor, Introduced by Ambrese Montagu

## The Growth of an Underclass: A Humanist Warning

The first danger is the growth of an underclass that is increasingly separated from the security enjoyed by the affluent. A society can become technologically richer while ordinary people become poorer in the things that make life feel secure: affordable housing, stable work, education, health care, leisure, privacy and the expectation that their children will do better than they did. Wealth increasingly buys protection from these pressures. Affluent families can purchase better schools, safer neighbourhoods, private services, legal assistance, healthier food and more living space, while poorer people are exposed to overcrowding, precarious employment, environmental hazards and deteriorating public services. Even something as basic as diet can become class-divided: people with money can more readily afford fresh food, organic produce and foods perceived as lower in contaminants, while poorer households are pushed toward cheaper, highly processed foods. Concerns about microplastics and persistent chemicals add another dimension: the wealthy increasingly have the resources to reduce some exposures, while everyone else lives with the cumulative environmental burden. The result is not simply inequality of income, but inequality of health, safety, time, environment and life expectancy.

The second danger is that a growing underclass can experience not greater freedom, but greater regulation and surveillance. As poverty, homelessness, addiction, mental illness and public disorder become more visible, the political response can shift from providing social capacity to managing populations. More behaviour is classified, recorded, monitored and regulated. People who are poor may encounter the state disproportionately through police, courts, welfare offices, hospitals, shelters and surveillance systems rather than through universities, homeownership programs or opportunities for advancement. The boundary between poor, disordered, dangerous and mentally ill can become increasingly blurred. Civil liberties then become unequal in practice: the affluent have lawyers, privacy, private space and institutional influence; the poor have fewer resources with which to contest decisions made about them. The paradox is stark: as economic freedom declines for some, administrative control over them can increase.
The resulting society risks becoming physically, environmentally and politically segregated.

The humanist warning is therefore about more than economics. If a society permits a large underclass to grow while civil liberties contract, environmental risks accumulate and wealth becomes increasingly hereditary, it can lose the conditions that hold a democracy together. People who feel excluded from prosperity may lose faith in institutions; people who fear disorder may demand greater control; and governments may respond to social problems with surveillance and enforcement rather than investment and inclusion. The danger is a downward spiral: less security → more exclusion → more discrimination → less trust → more surveillance → more resentment → greater political instability. A society can remain wealthy on paper while becoming poorer in the things that make civilization humane: freedom, dignity, social mobility, trust and the belief that the future belongs to everyone—not merely to those whose parents already won it.

## Five discussion questions

  1. Are we witnessing the emergence of a new underclass, or a return to older forms of class society that the postwar welfare state temporarily moderated?
  2. When inherited housing, education and financial assistance determine life chances, what remains of the ideal of meritocracy?
  3. Where should society draw the boundary between legitimate public safety and the criminalization or medicalization of poverty, homelessness, addiction and mental distress?
  4. Does mass digital surveillance make citizens safer, or does it fundamentally change the relationship between the individual and the state?
  5. If Toronto lost electricity and safe running water for several days, who would be most vulnerable—and what does that reveal about the difference between private wealth and genuine social resilience?

Meet our diverse group, trade perspectives in a free and open forum and learn from others as they learn from you!

BTW: don't be concerned if there are not many RSVP’s. Many HAT members attend regularly but don’t sign up on Meetup. Our online meetings have been very popular often with 20-30 attendees.

Our Website (http://www.humanisttoronto.ca/)

You may also like