Stanford Prison Experiment- When Might Makes Right

We will be discussing the intricacies that accompany blindly following authority and the precarious situations we can find ourselves in when we do so. In order to better participate, please review the following videos prior to attending (Watch Time -16 minutes).
We will discuss the following clips:
The Stanford Prison Experiment Was One of the Most Disturbing Studies Ever (10:32)

Stanford Prison Experiment: Post-Experimental Interview (00:58)

Behind the Scenes with Prisoner 416 | The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unlocking the Truth (3:41)

Initially this group will be scheduled every two weeks at 4:00 pm-5:30 pm (CST) at Panera Bread, on University in Fort Worth until we can gauge consistent attendance and participation, with the intention of conducting weekly meetings.

Panera Bread 1700 S University Dr, Fort Worth, TX 76107.
I will be wearing a purple and orange beanie.
The format of the group will consistently follow this pattern:

1. Settle in and start within first 10 minutes.
2. Review Ground Rules, Expectations and Weekly Topic (5-10 minutes)
3. Ice-breaker (will change every week) (10-20 minutes)
4. Main Topic of Discussion (45-60 minutes)
5. Closing Thoughts (10 minute)

The intention for "Blind Spots" is to intentionally discuss our own and society's various mental, emotional, ethical and moral boundaries and blind spots. These are by definition, emotionally charged topics, which is the very point.
The intention of this group is to learn how to better communicate and coincide with those you may not agree with or understand.
Blind Spots is intended to be a place were we can figure out how to better understand those we instinctively call the enemy.

Ground rules:

1. One person will speak at a time.
2. Critical thought and objection are both welcome, however be sure to challenge the content and not the personality.
3. When challenging another’s position, it is encouraged that you question from a place of “trying to understand the other individual’s position”, instead of intending on proving your point or theirs wrong through your questioning.

4)In the event discussion gets heated and volatile between two individuals or factions, the discussion will be halted, followed by taking the next 5 to 10 minutes, to use the remaining parts of the group to break down what just occurred and where communication broke down.