Skip to content

Details

Every Sunday, a new lecture. We begin at 9:00 AM with informal conversation, followed by a focused dialogue at 9:15 AM and an open Q&A afterward.

This week, we ask a simple but far-reaching question: where does consciousness actually come from?

We begin with the Quantum Consciousness Hypothesis, most closely associated with Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff. In their Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR) model, consciousness arises from quantum processes inside neurons. On this view, conscious experience is not just something brains do, but something tied to the deepest laws of physics themselves.

Penrose’s motivation is not primarily biological, but philosophical. He argues that human understanding—especially in mathematics—cannot be fully explained by computation alone. From this, he concludes that consciousness must involve non-computational processes rooted in fundamental physics. Quantum mechanics, for Penrose, offers a possible opening where mind and matter meet in a way classical computation cannot capture.

We then turn to bees, which offer a very different and grounding perspective.

Bees have extremely small brains—about one million neurons—yet they can learn, solve problems, communicate, and adapt to new situations. They show memory, flexibility, and even behavior that looks emotion-like. Whatever consciousness is, bees appear to have some version of it. This matters because bee brains are warm, noisy biological systems, where fragile quantum effects are unlikely to play a central role. Their abilities seem to arise from classical neural networks and well-organized information processing.

What bees show us is that complex experience does not require complexity at the smallest scale. Instead, it seems to arise from how relatively simple parts are arranged, coordinated, and allowed to interact over time. Even with limited resources, a system can generate flexible behavior if it integrates information effectively and uses it to guide action.

Bees therefore suggest that consciousness may emerge from how a system is organized, rather than from quantum mechanics. If bees are conscious in any meaningful sense, then consciousness does not require quantum-level processes. Instead, it can arise at the systems level, through the integration of perception, memory, and behavior.

We conclude with David Deutsch, who helps frame what this means. Deutsch argues that explanation lives at the right level of abstraction. Just as understanding software requires more than understanding transistors, understanding consciousness requires more than understanding quantum physics.

Deutsch’s point is not that physics is irrelevant, but that better explanations come from the level where patterns, functions, and purposes become visible. Consciousness, like knowledge or computation, is best understood not by looking smaller and smaller, but by looking at how systems are structured and what they are able to do.

Quantum Consciousness

Bees & Systems-Level Cognition

Emergence & Explanation

TIMEZONES
6:00 AM — Pacific (USA)
7:00 AM — Mountain (USA)
8:00 AM — Central (USA)
9:00 AM — Eastern (USA)
The meeting begins at 9:00 AM Eastern, with dialogue starting promptly at 9:15 AM.

You may also like