A discussion on Differential Privacy


Details
Details
• What we'll do: Max Payton will be leading a discussion on Cynthia Dwork's Differential Privacy paper!
Abstract
In 1977 Dalenius articulated a desideratum for statistical
databases: nothing about an individual should be learnable from the
database that cannot be learned without access to the database. We give a general impossibility result showing that a formalization of Dalenius’ goal along the lines of semantic security cannot be achieved. Contrary to intuition, a variant of the result threatens the privacy even of someone not in the database. This state of affairs suggests a new measure, differential privacy, which, intuitively, captures the increased risk to one’s privacy incurred by participating in a database.
• Important to know
As a chapter of Papers We Love we abide by and enforce the PWL Code of Conduct (https://github.com/papers-we-love/seattle/blob/master/code-of-conduct.md) at our events. Please give it a read, plan on acting like an adult, and involve one of the organizers if you need help.
Stop slacking and join us in the #seattle channel at https://papersweloveslack.herokuapp.com!
If you have a paper you'd like to present, or even just a mini, please hit up one of the organizers :) We're always looking for more presenters.

A discussion on Differential Privacy