Skip to content

Details

The term self-actualization gets thrown around quite a bit, in particular when referring the growth of an individual toward fulfillment of their highest needs; to an ideal state of living.

But is there a place for this concept in modern psychology?

If so, what are we talking about when we talk about self actualization? Is it the same as happiness, self-fulfillment, or being in a state of flow? What kinds of things would constitute our 'highest needs' (as opposed to more base or middle of the rung needs)?

Is Maslow correct when he claims that these needs are part of a hierarchy we much climb? Can we not just lower our standards on the previous steps on the hierarchy and skip straight to the self-actualizing needs, like an ascetic who retreats to the cave? If we could get to self-actualizing earlier, what is stopping us?

What other conditions are required for us to call ourselves self-actualized? Must we be creative? Must we avoid conformity? Can we do it together with others or is it something we must do by ourselves?

Join us on Wednesday with your questions, theories and an open mind.

Members are also interested in