Enrico Fermi, a physicist who emigrated from Italy to
the United States to play a major role in the Manhattan Project,
once gazed at the starry sky, having done a rough feasibility
analysis of interstellar travel, concluding that there was no
obvious explanation for why we are not being visited often by
aliens, and asked, "Where are they?" His question has become known
as the "
Fermi Paradox", although it is not,
strictly speaking, a "paradox", but a question that begs an
explanation.
This
recent Huffington Post article has a good summary
of the issues involved, why they are important, and why they are
much more difficult than we might at first think. It describes
some of the possible solutions to the Paradox proposed by various
scholars. It has also been discussed by Oxford philosopher Nick
Bostrom in
this
2008 article. However, they missed one explanation:
In 1991 I wrote an article that provides the explanation. Search
on "
Three Futures for
Earth" (with the quotes). It is based on a thermodynamic
analysis that leads to several conclusions:
1. There are fundamental limits to what can be technologically
achieved, no matter how "advanced" the civilization, and we may
already be approaching those limits, except perhaps in a few
directions, such as an FTL drive;
2. Given those limits, it would not be rational for any
long-enduring civilization to try to live scattered on the
surfaces of planets. The only sustainable living environment would
be urban biospheres ("starship cities") sited below the surfaces
of planets with hot cores, which would provide the little energy
they would need, while recycling almost all materials, and
emitting only a little waste heat; therefore,
3. There are no Type I, II, or III, civilizations, because no
civilization would have any good reason to become one. Anthills
don't need to capture and use all possible free energy. They only
need enough to sustain themselves as anthills;
4. If an FTL drive, such as an
Alcubierre drive, becomes possible,
then it would make no sense to waste energy using electromagnetic
radiation to communicate. It would be cheaper to travel to places
and deliver messages directly. If EM radiation were used, it would
make no sense to waste energy broadcasting. The only rational
method would be narrow-beam directed at the recipient, with little
or no leakage;
5. If FTL is possible, then we could have outposts of a million
alien civilizations beneath our feet and never know it, provided
they got along with one another. We may not be a "nature
preserve", except perhaps to a few alien scientists. To most we
would just be barnacles on the ship. If FTL is not possible, we
might only have a few dozen, deep enough that no drill will ever
reach them;
6. The ultimate end of human development is likely to be single
networks of running computer programs (except the computers will
be quantum). This is the "singularity" foreseen by some futurists.
It is a mistake to presume that any technological civilization
will always expand its size, range, and use of energy to the
limits of physics and technology. Human civilizations have tended
to expand, but they also tend to fall apart, and not necessarily
when resource limits are reached. There are also economic and
manageability limits that are subtle and complex, but which can be
expected to bring growth to a halt well short of what physics and
technology might allow. There may also be a natural tendency to
evolve in a way that leaves the civilization with no interest in
the kinds of things that would interest us.
It is also a mistake to presume that technological progress will
continue forever, along every course. There is nothing inevitable
about that. Every technology is an exploitation of a limited
opportunity provided by nature that, like an ore deposit, is
eventually exhausted. Eventually, one can expect to find no more
such opportunities. We don't know where the limits are, but we can
be sure they exist at some point. It is likely that most alien
civilizations older than ours have long since reached those
limits, and that we may not be far behind them.
So if we eventually become aware there are, say, 20 alien
civilizations with outposts on this (not "our") planet, we can
tentatively conclude no FTL drive is possible.