Skip to content

Details

What if the great philosophers of reason—Aristotle, Nietzsche, even the Stoics, had access to modern neuroscience? What if they knew just how much of our desire, mood, and behavior unfolds before conscious thought ever shows up?

Welcome to a discussion on the human mind, where we discuss if reason is really the ruler of human life, or is it more like a clever advisor hired after decisions are already in motion?

Drawing from naturalistic theories of mind, ranging from Daniel Dennett’s philosophy to contemporary affective and cognitive science, we’ll explore a picture of the human being where reason is a tool shaped by biology, not a detached judge hovering above it.

From this lens, we’ll ask what happens to morality, meaning, ambition, and even “free will” when thinking is understood less as access to timeless truths and more as a strategy for regulating discomfort, desire, and uncertainty.

Notes:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1eK1oC3wKdb3JX7_JT0vs6SZtLaGp1IeQ

Location changed to online, refer to the Zoom link

AI summary

By Meetup

Discussion for philosophy-minded learners on whether reason rules or is a biology-shaped advisor, with takeaways on free will.

Related topics

Intellectual Discussions
Knowledge Sharing
Philosophy
Philosophy of Mind
Consciousness

You may also like