Do we need to accept the possibility of mistakes to make progress? (Abingdon)

When Thomas Edison was asked about his many failed attempts to invent the electric light bulb, he reportedly replied, “I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work.” This anecdote reflects a deeper philosophical question: do we need to accept the possibility of mistakes to make progress? Some argue that mistakes are not just an inevitable part of learning but a necessary one. From scientific breakthroughs to artistic innovation, history shows that error often precedes insight. In this view, progress depends on a willingness to take risks, to challenge assumptions, and to embrace failure as a stepping stone. Accepting the possibility of mistakes opens the door to experimentation and growth, fostering resilience and the humility needed for genuine advancement.

On the other hand, others maintain that too much acceptance of mistakes can lead to carelessness or justify harmful outcomes. In fields like medicine, engineering, or ethics, mistakes can have irreversible consequences, making it dangerous to treat them lightly. This perspective emphasises precision, accountability, and the importance of minimising error through careful planning and rigorous standards. From this view, progress comes not from embracing mistakes, but from learning to avoid them as much as possible, ensuring that the pursuit of advancement does not come at an unacceptable cost.

Join us to discuss: Can meaningful progress occur without trial and error? How do we distinguish between productive mistakes and reckless ones? Are some fields of knowledge more tolerant of error than others? What role does failure play in personal versus collective development? And does fear of mistakes hinder innovation or protect against unnecessary risk?

Anyone can attend this session. No experience in philosophy or knowledge of the subject is required in advance. Just come along and enjoy. Our events use the 4Cs of community philosophy:

• Caring for others, making space for their contributions
• Collaborating to get a better mutual understanding rather than scoring points
• Critically assessing what we say, clarifying what is meant and asking what reasons support assertions
• Creatively coming up with alternative perspectives, rather than dogmatically sticking to our initial positions

We welcome everyone of a wide range of ages, social and educational backgrounds etc. Don't worry if you don't have a qualification in philosophy - almost no-one does. Occasionally, attendees will be asked to watch, read or listen to a short piece of material in advance of the session (as the 'stimulus' for discussion), but this will be minimal and will be made clear in the description of the session.

Note that we collect voluntary contributions from attendees to cover the cost of the Meetup subscription. First time attendees and anyone who is financially stretched need not contribute.