By what criteria might a principle of value have priority over other values?

Workshop # 9, Criteria of Values, Series 12, (S7,30)
This event begins 7.30 pm S'pore & WA time, 12.30 pm UK, 7.30 am NY.
An AI summary of the meeting will be in the relevant Youtube comments.

You will need to view the relevant podcast below on YouTube before joining the meeting in order to participate in the discussion.
https://youtu.be/pX029aj4PjY
I know it's stupid, but please click 'like', as it promotes circulation.
Join this group at meetup.com/philosophy-of-value-workshops
And buy my book The Pursuit of Value from Amazon Books

The workshops include of a prior presentation of the topic by myself on YouTube that you need to watch. The meeting itself consists of a brief review of the topic followed by questions and discussion. The weekly topic is posted a week before the event, together with a suggested reading from my work The Pursuit of Value, available through Amazon Books or myself. Transcripts of the Youtube presentation are available by email.

THIS WEEK: Nietzsche presented the future task of philosophers as the determination of “the order and rank among values”. But rank and hierarchy have given way to radical revision and questions of coherence. And a question of priority remains all the more crucial amongst hedonistic, aesthetic, ethical and other values. GE Moore defined intrinsic value by its ‘organic unity’. Sartre advocated freedom and choice. Can we determine the priority of values by such ‘internal’ criteria, or are values just subject to ‘external’ criteria like social or neurological influences? Reading: The Pursuit of Value, Ch. 2, Scn. ix.