Skip to content

Details

Helsinki Testing Breakfast — Meetup #3: working with requirements & AI.

We've all been there: a ticket with three words, a Figma link that's two versions old, and a deadline tomorrow. So we figure it out ourselves. We always do.
But is that fine? Should testers just accept that requirements are broken — or should we be pushing back harder? And now that AI can generate acceptance criteria in seconds, does that change anything? If change - is it a positive change?

This Friday over coffee, let's dig in:

  • When there are no requirements, how do you decide what to test?
  • Are AI-generated requirements actually testable — or just more noise?
  • How do you raise quality concerns when "move fast" is the answer to everything?
  • What's the tester's role when the spec is vibes and a Slack message?

All experience levels welcome — whether you've been testing for 6 months or 16 years, you've learned something worth sharing.
See you!

Related topics

Events in Helsinki, FI
Agile Testing
Software QA and Testing
Context Driven Testing
Requirements Management

You may also like