Breakfast #3: Requirements in AI world
Details
Helsinki Testing Breakfast — Meetup #3: working with requirements & AI.
We've all been there: a ticket with three words, a Figma link that's two versions old, and a deadline tomorrow. So we figure it out ourselves. We always do.
But is that fine? Should testers just accept that requirements are broken — or should we be pushing back harder? And now that AI can generate acceptance criteria in seconds, does that change anything? If change - is it a positive change?
This Friday over coffee, let's dig in:
- When there are no requirements, how do you decide what to test?
- Are AI-generated requirements actually testable — or just more noise?
- How do you raise quality concerns when "move fast" is the answer to everything?
- What's the tester's role when the spec is vibes and a Slack message?
All experience levels welcome — whether you've been testing for 6 months or 16 years, you've learned something worth sharing.
See you!
Related topics
Events in Helsinki, FI
Agile Testing
Software QA and Testing
Context Driven Testing
Requirements Management
