The Extrapolation Of Many

The Extrapolation Of Many, 10/tbd/25: Dr Martin Luther (quotes), Dr Immanuel Kant (quotes), Mr Tracy my high school college advisor- conversation in 1994 when I was age 17, Mrs Barnes my high school bus driver- conversation in 1993 when I was age 16, the co-creators of cartoon Underdog, reruns on TV weekly in 1993-1994: W. Watts Biggers, Chet Stover, Joe Harris, and Treadwell D. Covington, the writers for the band Disturbed's song Just Stop (1/2005), and the writers for music artist Pink's song Raise Your Glass (1/2011), and later in 1/2011, when I took another look at a paragraph in CEO Haugen's book (Just Courage 2009) along with a paragraph in Coach McCartney's excerpt in the same book where the takeaway is that good shouldn't fear evil, evil should fear good because when good puts up a persistent fight, evil does yield to good, because no this wasn't the case of successful people being successful at something else this time that they are underdogs fighting back against the most notorious topdogs and winning, and this was proof to me from all of the above and which I've been working on defining for 2 1/2 years:

Now in one word:

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 The Extrapolation Of Many is to be used for decision-making.

🟩 for The Extrapolation Of Many, this was second to last litmus test:

Our litmus test using faith the thought instead of faith the emotion/feeling:

Which statement leads me to think that having [what matters most to you in life] is most guaranteed??

🟩 This is a guide because the theory is that this is how things play out in reality but not sure if it reached its limit or not:

➡️An underdog knows what a topdog is and a topdog knows what an underdog is.

➡️An underdog does what's good no matter who, what, when, where, why, and how because they think that it will benefit them when they know that they have nothing to show for their goodwill until one day: that the good or evil that people do catches up with them one day. Now that's faith.

➡️A topdog does what's evil no matter who, what, when, where, why, and how because they think that it will benefit them when they know that they have nothing to show for their evilwill until one day: that the good or evil that people do catches up with them one day. Now that's unfaith.

➡️An underdog and a topdog get an attitude with each other and they try to sabotage each other's efforts.

🟩 With an improved attachment, it's usually a matter of speed- the one that gets you to the same decision faster.

🟩 Scientific Method:

(1) topic

(2) research

(3) question based on that

(4) research to find answer

(5) hypothesis (a proposed answer/a proposed theory, so still an if/then statement, directly or indirectly)

(6) test hypothesis with experiment

(7) result

(8) repeat experiment to make sure same result

(9) theory (conclusion, an if/then statement, whether directly or indirectly).

(10) How are you going to apply the theory in the world??

Ain't this what we were taught back in the 1980s and 90s??

🟩 Critical thinking exercise:

(1) Who?? An underdog and a topdog.

(2) What?? Get an attitude with each other and try to sabotage each other's efforts.

(3) When?? Opportunity.

(4) Where?? Opportunity.

(5) Why?? Because an underdog thinks that good triumphs over evil because it should and knows that a topdog thinks the opposite, so they know that they can because they should.

(6) How?? By not backing down.

🟩 If anything, including information, can determine our will, then it isn't completely free. So order would then be:

(1) or (2) Goodthinker

(1) or (2) Good-willer

To test out too in case: Goodwillers

(3) Good-judger

To test out too in case: Goodjudgers

(4) Good-valuer

To test out too in case: Goodvaluers

(5) Good-goaler

To test out too in case: Goodgoalers

(6) Gooddecider

🟩 Now this is our litmus test: compare by testing using on a when you know better, you can do better past decision.

🟩 Regarding (3) and (5) above which I didnt get a chance to test out yet because I'm burntout, but others can, regarding (5), well thinking about scientifically proven RECBT for example, you notice whether a thought needs to stay or go based on your actions/behavior....

🟩 Used future probability for decision based on current situation as a litmus test for a year and it didn't work because too many unknowns.... 😭😭.

Has to be 11 characters because of what's going on behind the scenes- I started working on it in 2011 but had to stop until more recently.