addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscontroller-playcredit-cardcrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobe--smallglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramFill 1launch-new-window--smalllight-bulblinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonprintShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

Re: [linux-5] Moving back to Windows from Linux?

From: user 2.
Sent on: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 1:18 PM
On Oct 25, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:

> On 25/10/[masked]:57, Wong Boon Hong wrote:
>> I have quite a few bad experience from updates/patchings (including Microsoft
>> Windows and vmware ESX) and find the risk of patching my system is often more
>> dangerous than retaining them as outdated system. 
>> So do you guys update your apps and Linux often? Especially Servers? I always
>> update my desktop but not server as I can't afford the downtime that affect so
>> many users.
> My desktop (laptop, really), which runs Ubuntu, I update all the time, but with
> my servers, I'm more careful with the upgrades I do.
> The server I maintain, which hosts and sg.releases.ubuntu.c­om, runs
> Debian, which provides security updates or bug fixes with minimal impact to
> their stable releases. I generally apply those updates and do a little testing
> after, because they've already gone through a considerable amount of testing
> before being released into the repository and are quite unlikely to break.
> That said, updates always do pose a risk of breaking your system, usually
> proportional to how big the update is, so I usually keep an eye out for packages
> that are essential to the server's operations and make sure they continue
> working after. And for major distro upgrades like from Debian Lenny to Debian
> Squeeze, I prefer to have physical access to the machine before running the
> upgrades.
> On the other hand, like Harish said, by not updating your server, you're just
> setting yourself up for trouble. Skipping security updates can leave your server
> open to known security holes, which can in turn lead to your server getting
> compromised. And the cost of recovering a compromised machine is much more than
> the cost of recovering from a borked upgrade.
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> Loong Jin

Basically what Loong Jin and a couple of others have said, leaving _any_ system unpatched or skipping security updates because it's "too messy or too troublesome" is only setting yourself up for a massive clean up job when someone decides to run the sploit against it. Look no further than the issues that were plaguing Safari recently, that should scare the heck out of anyone.


People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy