Failure - an end in itself or a means to an end?

Failure is always defined in the context of as an opposite to success, as an unwanted outcome or as a loss. Is there more to failure than just a lack of success? Join us to discuss if a deeper meditation on failure is possible.

• Failure as an innately worthwhile pursuit- Is there more to failure than just as an undesirable opposite of success? Or can there be appreciation for a deeper understanding of failure? With reference to the Samuel Beckett quote ‘Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better’, is it worthwhile to fail better without the presence of success?
• Failure as an existential human condition- Alexander Leskanich defines failure here ‘failure occurs whenever expectation and reality are unable to synchronise; when cause is disproportionate to effect, or outcome veers off wildly from intention’. A parallel to this within the context of existentialism can be- we humans are meaning seeking individuals (expectation) but the universe offers no inherent meaning in return (reality). Do you agree that failure is at the core of our existence and therefore it shapes every human experience?
• How society treats individual failure?- Do you believe failure is essential to character building? If so, should society discourage failure through constant punishment? Is society too broken and individuals irredeemable for them to learn lessons from failure without punishment?
• How you treat your own failure? - What's your personal philosophy about failure? Is there a well defined philosophy you prescribe to when it comes to failure?

Optional Reading

1. "On the Feeling of Some Essential Failure": Alexandre Leskanich Reviews "In Praise of Failure" by Costica Bradatan https://www.thephilosopher1923.org/post/on-the-feeling-of-some-essential-failure
2. “Sharing our lives with the people we have failed to be”: Ethan Richardson https://mbird.com/psychology/sharing-our-lives-with-the-people-we-have-failed-to-be/

Thanks to Spartacus Books for generously opening up their space for us! If you're able, please support them with a small donation (suggested: $2), or with a purchase if one of their titles catches your fancy.

Shy Philosopher Night Procedure and Code of Ethics:
1. Discussion Style
We aim for a cooperative flow, like passing a ball among teammates rather than engaging in back-and-forth debates. Please share the “ball” so everyone has a voice.
2. Brief Points (2-3 Minutes)
Keep points concise so we can hear a variety of perspectives. Occasional exceptions may come up naturally, but our goal is inclusivity.
3. No Crosstalk
Respect the speaker’s time without interjecting or questioning mid-speech. If you’d like to add something, simply raise your hand and the facilitator will guide the flow.
4. Avoid Ad Hominem Remarks
Focus critiques on ideas, actions, or beliefs—not people. For example, say “This idea could have certain impacts” rather than “You’re wrong.” This ensures a respectful environment.
5. Respectful Engagement
As we are guests in someone’s home, let’s maintain a high level of respect for the space and one another. Mindfulness, patience, and courtesy are essential to making this gathering comfortable and enjoyable for all.
6. Cancellation Courtesy
If your plans change and you’re unable to attend, please let us know at least a day in advance by canceling your RSVP. Since space is limited, early notice helps ensure that someone else interested can join in your place. We really appreciate your understanding and help in making this a smooth, inclusive experience for everyone.

Looking forward to seeing you there!