Skip to content

Details

For generations, women have challenged expectations that confined them to the home, limited their opportunities, and restricted their financial independence. Today, however, some women are embracing a lifestyle centered on homemaking, motherhood, traditional femininity, and a husband as provider.

Is this a rejection of feminism, or an expression of the freedom it helped make possible?

A woman may freely choose to devote herself to her family, while another may find fulfilment in her career, financial independence, or remaining unmarried. Yet both may face judgement: one for being too dependent, the other for being too ambitious or insufficiently feminine.
This raises a deeper question: when does a personal choice express freedom, and when does it reflect expectations, we have learned to accept?

Our preferences are shaped by family, culture, religion, economics, relationships, and social media. Even the desire to be independent can become an expectation we feel pressured to fulfil. If neither traditional nor modern womanhood exists outside social influence, how do we distinguish a choice freely made from one shaped by pressure?
Perhaps the tension is not simply between tradwives and feminists, but between different ideas of what makes a woman free, equal, and fulfilled.

Questions we may explore

  1. Who gets to define female empowerment, and how should we judge whether women with radically different lives are equally empowered when their choices are shaped by unequal social, cultural, and economic conditions?
  2. To what extent is choosing a traditional role an expression of freedoms secured by feminism, and under what conditions might that choice reinforce the inequalities feminism seeks to challenge?
  3. Can a woman be genuinely free when her financial security depends entirely on her husband, or does freedom require the practical ability to leave or choose differently?
  4. Can traditional gender roles coexist with equality, or do their expectations inevitably create unequal authority, dependence, and power between men and women?
  5. What social assumptions cause ambition and independence to be praised in men but interpreted as selfishness, inadequacy, or unfemininity in women?
  6. Has modern society genuinely expanded women’s freedom, or has it replaced older restrictions with pressure to succeed simultaneously in work, family, appearance, and relationships?
  7. When does celebrating traditional femininity affirm one way of life, and when does it become a standard used to devalue women who choose differently?
  8. Why are women’s lifestyle choices so often treated as evidence of their character or worth, and whose interests are served by judging them in this way?
  9. Can a woman consistently support feminist equality while choosing a relationship in which her husband leads and provides, and what would make such an arrangement freely chosen rather than structurally unequal?
  10. Should freedom be judged by the life a woman chooses, or by whether she has the economic, social, and legal power to reject that life and realistically choose another?

There may be no single answer. Perhaps the more important question is whether women can pursue different visions of a fulfilling life without being treated as less worthy, less feminine, or less free.

Further Reading (Optional)
Curious to explore the ideas behind our discussion? The following readings offer philosophical, sociological, and economic perspectives on women's autonomy, traditional gender roles, feminism, and unpaid care work.
No prior reading is required. These resources are offered for those who wish to explore the topic further.
1. Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2024)
Explores whether people can make autonomous choices when their preferences are shaped by social expectations, relationships, and unequal power.
https://l1nq.com/1b1wxp9

2. Proctor, D. (2022). “The #Tradwife Persona and the Rise of Radicalized Domesticity.” Persona Studies, 8(2).
Examines how online tradwife identities present traditional domesticity and femininity, including the movement's connections with broader ideological narratives. https://ojs.deakin.edu.au/index.php/ps/article/view/1645

3. Pilyarchuk, K., & Graf, E. (2026). “From ‘I've Always Wanted to Be a Homemaker’ to ‘Feminism Is Cancer’: Performing Tradwife Identity in Instagram Reels.” Discourse, Context & Media, 70, Article 100995.
Investigates how tradwife influencers construct and communicate traditional femininity and identity through social media.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221169582600022X?via%3Dihub

4. Budgeon, S. (2015). “Individualized Femininity and Feminist Politics of Choice.” European Journal of Women's Studies, 22(3), 303–318.
Questions whether individual choice alone is enough to establish women's liberation, drawing attention to the social conditions in which choices are made.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1350506815576602

5. Addati, L., Cattaneo, U., Esquivel, V., & Valarino, I. (2018). Care Work and Care Jobs for the Future of Decent Work. International Labour Organization.
Examines unpaid care work, its unequal distribution, and the implications for gender equality and women's economic opportunities. https://www.ilo.org/publications/major-publications/care-work-and-care-jobs-future-decent-work

6. OECD. (2019). Enabling Women's Economic Empowerment: New Approaches to Unpaid Care Work in Developing Countries. OECD Publishing.
Explores how unpaid care responsibilities, public services, and economic conditions influence women's opportunities to participate in paid employment. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/enabling-women-s-economic-empowerment_ec90d1b1-en.html

7. Walsh, M. B. (2015). “Feminism, Adaptive Preferences, and Social Contract Theory.” Hypatia, 30(4), 829–845.
Examines how social constraints may shape people's preferences and raises questions about how to distinguish autonomous choices from preferences formed under restrictive conditions. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/hypatia/article/abs/feminism-adaptive-preferences-and-social-contract-theory/A84F3E6EC61FEED97E20ABDE68EE386F

8. The tradwife phenomenon isn't a return to tradition, it's a plea for balance
https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/the-tradwife-phenomenon-isnt-a-return-to-tradition-its-a-plea-for-balance

9. The truth about “tradwives” and the men who want them | 60 Minutes Australia
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0CXoASDQ6U

10. What Is a 'Tradwife' and How Does It Differ from Stay-at-Home Moms?
Article: https://www.parents.com/tradwife-meaning-and-why-its-controversial-8656603

Related topics

Events in Kuala Lumpur, MY
Humanism
Intellectual Discussions
Philosophy
Socrates Cafe
Psychology

You may also like