Multiverse/Simulation/Creation, which is more likely? - Open Discussion

Which theory/hypothesis do you think is more likely: the idea that a multi-verse exists, we live in a simulation, or is there an intelligent creator of the universe? You could easily add more options of you think those are more likely, such as "nothing". Either way, does the evidence as we know it seem to be leaning towards a certain conclusion?

The multi-verse theory has become more popular in recent movies such as certain Marvel movies and Everything Everywhere All At Once. I personally believe the idea of a multi-verse as we define it is impossible, and is ultimately a paradox.

The simulation hypothesis could be a form of "creation", just not a religious version of it. Unless we are a simulation that manifested itself in a universe without a creator.

This can go in a lot of directions and don't want to put too much here. I'm most interested in talking about how the multi-verse theory is a paradox and our understanding of it is impossible. But otherwise looking forward to talk a lot about something that I'm way under qualified for!

What are your thoughts? Come join us for a fun and thought-provoking discussion! This group is for all people will all backgrounds and opinions. The more diversity of views the better.

For online discussions like these, we try to keep it one person at a time, taking turns with the "Raise Hand" feature. As a courtesy to others, please keep your turns as quick as possible, knowing that we can always come back to you on additional turns. If you have 3 or 4 points to make, just stick with 1 or two per turn so we can keep the flow of the group going.

Hope you can join us!