Argument Game: We should build a technologically enabled direct democracy

Daniel is making the argument that “Representative nation-state capitalism should be replaced with a technologically enabled direct democracy and universal access to life’s necessities.”

His expanded argument is that: “Modern society still runs on ancient systems of hierarchy, tribalism, and wealth hoarding. The social habits and institutions that developed around these systems are the primary barriers to the next stage of human progress.”

We will be testing the current argument game format using the “Argument without Challenger” path.