Re: [Public-Transit-Data-Summit] New York MTA changes stance on open data

From: noel h.
Sent on: Friday, October 9, 2009 12:35 AM
this is awesome! there really is light at the end of the tunnel!

2009/10/8 Samuel Wong <[address removed]>

http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post.cgi?id=3738

��

I���m glad Council Member Brewer���s letter to the MTA worked. ��We���re still waiting for their response���.will send out a copy once we get it.

��

Sam

New York MTA changes stance on open data

The New York MTA has a new policy: Transit data is more valuable to the agency when released publicly at no charge than when hoarded as a potential source of revenue.

The MTA wasn't getting any money from Google in exchange for including it in Google Transit, but was demanding payment from smaller developers like StationStops, one guy who built a iPhone app with Metro-North schedules in his spare time. MTA even sued StationStops and got Apple to pull the app.

But following widespread coverage in the press, and a letter from New York Councilmember Gale Brewer, and a new MTA chief, the agency decided to reverse course. They dropped the complaint against StationStops and fellow iPhone app The Next Train, a different programmer's app for the Long Island Rail Road. This week, Apple finally reinstated StationStops to the App Store.

MTA officials told the New York Times that they're "trying to evolve" to address this "emerging area." Colin Durrant of Massachusetts' Office of Transportation, which released data freely in August, told the Times:

We felt it was an essential role of government to open up our data and our information to developers. Rather than having a consultant develop a tool or an application or some sort of software, why not put the data out there and have people compete to develop products that we might not have the time nor the money to create? It's a win-win for everybody.

At the recent Metro board meeting, Alternate Director Gordon Linton argued that WMATA shouldn't release data without ensuring they get a cut, and even though Google wasn't paying MTA or anyone else for data, that means nothing because they hadn't asked. MTA's policy decision here changes that. They didn't ask, but they asked from others, and have decided officially that they won't and shouldn't ask. That's because the value to riders far exceeds the paltry revenue impact of this issue, and even Google isn't "lining their pockets." WMATA may now be the only major transit agency without a policy encouraging innovative applications that help riders. It's time to stop being the last holdout.

��

��

Samuel Wong ���Fordham University, LC 2009, GSAS 2010

Legislative Aide on Technology in Government

Office of Council Member Gale A. Brewer

The New York City Council

250 Broadway, Suite 1744

New York, NY 10007

City Hall: P: (212) [masked] ����� F: (212) [masked]

M: (646)[masked]

[address removed]

P Please consider the environment before printing this message.

��

A country cannot subsist well without liberty, nor liberty without virtue. ���Daniel Webster

Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus. - Cicero

Government is a trust, and the officers of the government are trustees. And both the trust and the trustees are created for the benefit of the people. -Henry Clay

��





--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Samuel Wong ([address removed]) from New York Public Transit Data Summit.
To learn more about Samuel Wong, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup Inc. PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York[masked] | [address removed]

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy