I would like to add my thanks to those of Fernando.
It's easy to take those meetups for granted but it takes time and resources to make them happen.
Thanks to you and Tim Group for hosting.
On 6 Nov 2011, at 21:19, Fernando Racca wrote:
First of all I'd like to thank everybody especially you Pawel for organising the dojo. I think it was really productive.
From my point of view, i think we should continue with the same format and leverage all the setup work we had to do last time. If we continue working on the same projects, we can ideally start reaching more advanced code, patterns and actually see something more than a dummy code passing a test.
I strongly agree that having infrastructure to support the development will really help. Ideally we can go towards common project setups, so is just easier for everybody to concentrate in hacking away
On 6 November[masked]:56, Pawel Krupinski <[address removed]>
I'd like to ask for your feedback on the last dojo's format - small
modules dependent on each other (at least when we wire them together).
Let me know what you think. Should we continue this format? What would
you change, add or remove from the way we did things?
I for one enjoyed it a lot (we managed to create something that worked
:)). I would like to integrate and test early (through tests and CI)
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Pawel Krupinski
<[address removed]> wrote:
> Both single and multi-session projects will be all about learning Scala. There is no pressure or deadline to deliver anything so feel free to ask lots of questions. I get your point though. Let's discuss and decide on the project at tonight's meeting.
> On 19 Oct 2011, at 10:39, Patrice <[address removed]> wrote:
>> I don't how many, but a number of LSUG members are also following the Stanford experiment (DB, AI and ML courses).
>> Maybe there would be a possibility to mix it with Joe's suggestion (which I guess would also involve Lift).
>> This looks like a substantial (but interesting) project.
>> Lightning talks
>> Maybe the DB, AI and ML stuff could be used as lightning talks subjects?
>> Pawel, would it be reasonable to run a pole to see if LSUG members prefer to work on multi sessions projects or single session katas?
>> I am at a more basic level than many so I would favour the latter.
>> That said, if the majority prefers projects, I would still show up to learn what I can.
>> On 18 Oct 2011, at 18:57, Joe Pugh wrote:
>>> How about an auction site?
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Pawel Krupinski
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 18,[masked]:41 PM
>>> To: [address removed]
>>> Subject: Re: [lsug] The next Scala Dojo project
>>> Still waiting for thos project ideas.
>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Patrice <[address removed]>
>>>> I'm not sure about the longer projects but I like the idea of a web app
>>>> with Lift.
>>>> The use of CI is a great idea.
>>>> On 13 Oct 2011, at 11:37, Pawel Krupinski wrote:
>>>>> Hi guys and gals.
>>>>> At the last Scala Dojo I was asked if we should do a bigger project at
>>>>> the Scala Dojos - spanning at least couple of meetings if not couple
>>>>> of months.
>>>>> Old timers remember the was Minesweeper dragged for months, but with
>>>>> the new formula we could probably make a big project work.
>>>>> One approach would be for to make the project modular and each of the
>>>>> teams would work on one of the modules. To keep the teams focussed, we
>>>>> would start by writing integration tests ensuring proper interaction /
>>>>> APIs of the modules, maybe even set up a continuous integration build
>>>>> running somewhere. This way we would also ensure that the code is
>>>>> frequently commited to the repo.
>>>>> So tell me, what would you like to work on? Some kind of algorithmic
>>>>> challenge, a webapp maybe (this way we could also learn Lift) or
>>>>> something else?