Comprehensivist Wednesdays: Do We Need a Sage?

Wisdom is never neutral. It is always shaped by cultural choices about what counts as a good life and who embodies it. Traditions across cultures create figures of the sage, whether in philosophy, religion, or community life, to embody ideals of wisdom and provide a guiding model for how human beings might live well. This makes guidance accessible and memorable, but it can also narrow the richness of moral experience by measuring it against an unreachable ideal. The sage simplifies the path to wisdom, yet risks distorting it if taken too literally.

The real question is whether the sage is helpful. Philosophers like Seneca noted that while no one may ever become a sage, the very idea serves as a measuring rod for progress. Others, from Confucius to the Buddha, believed that the image of perfected wisdom or compassion is necessary as a compass, not as a destination. Seen this way, the sage is less a flawless being than a symbolic orientation point. This perspective restores context and meaning, reminding us that ideals should guide human flourishing rather than demand rigid perfectionism.

************************************************************
Welcome to the series "Comprehensivist Wednesdays." Transdisciplinarity, Renaissance humanism, homo universalis, and Polymathy are some of the ways of describing this approach which Buckminster Fuller called Comprehensivity and described as “macro-comprehensive and micro-incisive.”

See the calendar at https://www.meetup.com/52LivingIdeas/events/calendar/

A Meetup For Everyone!

Weekdays at 8 pm or 9 pm ET