About us
Philosophy in Pubs is a community philosophy group addressing big questions on a variety of topics in a relaxed, informal environment. We hold discussions, alternating between every few weeks in central Oxford and in Headington. No experience of philosophical enquiry necessary - the idea is that it is possible to talk about philosophical ideas without having to know a lot about what the ‘great’ philosophers thought about things. We are more interested in making progress through sensible conversation than having a heated debate where there are ‘winners’ and ‘losers’. We welcome anybody prepared to listen, engage positively, and have fun. This is a pub session open to a wide variety of participants, all, we hope, interested in stretching their minds.
We embrace the 4Cs of of community philosophy:
- Caring for others, making space for their contributions
- Collaborating to get a better mutual understanding rather than scoring points
- Critically assessing what we say, clarifying what is meant and asking what reasons support assertions
- Creatively coming up with alternative perspectives, rather than dogmatically sticking to our initial positions.
Please get in touch with any thoughts, concerns etc.
Upcoming events
24

Free Will - Philosophy in Pubs (Headington)
The Britannia Inn, 1 Lime Walk, London Road, Oxford, GBHow do you know that you actually choose anything? Perhaps a combination of history, biology, evolution, physics or just plain luck drive what we like to think of as ‘our decisions’. Yet the concept of free will is a key component of what you could call common sense. It also has a legal standing in regard to human behaviour. Relatively recently advances in neuroscience have led some interesting observations on what is happening when we think (or think we think). We recommend that you read a layman’s introduction to that research via the following link in advance as a starting point for the session https://www.sciencefocus.com/wellbeing/free-will-neuroscience.
In this session we will first discuss what we mean by free will and and follow that with a discussion of the implications of different views of this concept.
Part 1 - What is Free Will? Can it Exist?
Can we agree on a definition of the common sense view of free will?
Can free will really exist as it is framed by the common sense view?
How can a person whose existence and internal processes are determined by physical laws have free will?
What is the source of free will in a person?
Can we provide a definition of free will that a neuroscientist can use?Part 2 - Implications of Free Will
Perception. We seem to have a strong perception of free will. We might even go further and assume that there is a conceptual gap between how one experiences free will and one actually arrives at a decision i.e. assume at some level that free will is a delusion. Does this gap exist? Is the gap an inherent outcome of how we perceive free will and the physical basis of the mind?
Humans as automatons. As a thought experiment consider what it would be like not to have the perception of free will, rather like Zombies are imagined in films. Perhaps this would be a mindstate where one is fully conscious of everything including one’s own behaviour but the causes of that behaviour are entirely unknown. Essentially in this experiment all decision making is sub-conscious. What aspects of human existence would be lost in the experiment? If the experiment affected a group of people what kinds of issues might arise in their interactions?
Evolution. Why have we evolved to have a perception of free will? What is the function of the perception of free will?
Law. Does our common sense and legal view of responsibility rely on the concept of free will? Is the legal concept of diminished responsibility well defined from a philosophical or scientific perspective or is it just a pragmatic way to treat the mentally ill with compassion? (see this research paper’s introduction for an interesting discussion of this issue: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8192116/).
A view of diminished responsibility is that it implies a person can have “less” free will than another person. The legal system focuses on specific mental processes as constituting free will such as regulation of behaviour and understanding the implications of certain behaviours. Do all mental processes have a deterministic or random physical basis? In what sense are these regulatory processes “free”?
Is there a way to define responsibility as not dependent on free will? Would it ever be just to convict a person if we assume that free will was effectively absent from decision making? Does reducing the importance of free will as a concept force a more pragmatic view of the role of justice and punishment?
Oxford Philosophy in Pubs is community philosophy.
It is part of a national movement to encourage people to think about some of the 'big ideas' in life. No expertise necessary, only the desire to do what Wittgenstein described as 'untangling the knots in the way we think about things'.It is a collective activity, not a debating club.
Everyone attending, and there is often a wide range of people present, is encouraged to listen to and engage with the topic. We hope it is fun and provides plenty of food for thought.
The organisers are trying to find ways to collect money from attendees towards the costs of running the sessions, mostly the costs of using this Meetup site. Not sure we have found the best system yet. At the moment it's free at the point of use, though any cash offered will be gladly accepted on the night by any of the organisers.29 attendees
Past events
512




