Deep Thinkers Online - "What is Truth?"

One of the most profound questions humans have wrestled with for millennia is "What is Truth?" Philosophers, scientists, and theologians have all tried to pin it down, and each tradition frames “truth” differently:
Philosophical perspectives

• Correspondence theory: Truth is what matches reality. A statement is true if it reflects the way the world actually is.
• Coherence theory: Truth is about consistency within a system of beliefs. A claim is true if it fits logically with other accepted truths.
• Pragmatic theory: Truth is what works. If a belief proves useful and helps us navigate life effectively, it counts as true.
• Constructivist view: Truth is shaped by social, cultural, and linguistic contexts. What’s “true” depends on the framework we’re using.

Scientific perspective
Science treats truth as provisional. A theory is considered true if it explains evidence and withstands testing, but it’s always open to revision when new data arrives.
Spiritual perspective
Many religious traditions see truth as transcendent—something eternal, divine, or revealed. In this sense, truth isn’t just factual but deeply moral or spiritual.
Everyday perspective
In daily life, truth often means honesty or authenticity—being real with ourselves and others, not just stating facts but living in alignment with them.

So, truth can be seen as objective reality, coherent belief, practical utility, or spiritual revelation, depending on the lens you choose.

Truth in public discourse and civic engagement is both a currency and a battleground. It shapes legitimacy, trust, and collective action—but it’s also contested, reframed, and sometimes weaponized. For example:
Truth as Legitimacy

• Foundation of trust: Citizens rely on truthful information to evaluate leaders, policies, and institutions. Without it, legitimacy erodes.
• Transparency: Truthful communication from governments and advocates signals accountability, reinforcing democratic norms.

Truth as Persuasion

• Framing and narrative: In civic engagement, truth isn’t just about facts—it’s about how those facts are framed. Advocates often highlight certain truths to mobilize action while downplaying others.
• Emotional resonance: A truth that connects with lived experience is more persuasive than abstract data.

Truth as Contestation

• Competing truths: Different groups advance their own versions of truth, shaped by ideology, identity, or interest. Public discourse becomes a negotiation of which truths gain traction.
• Disinformation: Falsehoods can masquerade as truth, undermining civic participation and polarizing communities.

Truth as Collective Action

• Shared reality: Civic engagement depends on a baseline of agreed truths (e.g., election results, climate data). Without shared reality, cooperation collapses.
• Empowerment: Truth enables citizens to act with agency—knowing the facts about laws, rights, and opportunities allows them to participate meaningfully.

Dynamic Function
Truth in public life isn’t static. It’s constantly being:

• Tested (through debate, journalism, science, lived experience)
• Reframed (to resonate with different audiences)
• Defended (against distortion and manipulation)

In practice, truth functions as both a tool for empowerment and a site of struggle. Civic engagement thrives when truth is accessible, transparent, and relatable—but falters when truth is obscured or fragmented.

The online meetings will use Microsoft Teams, which will work in a browser but will works better using the app, which you can download from:

Download Microsoft Teams Desktop and Mobile Apps | Microsoft Teams
For a guide see:
Get started with Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Support