Auckland Deep Thinkers Sunday Lunch Book Club: "San Fransicko"

This month's book is San Fransicko (2021) by Michael Shellenberger.

The book examines homelessness, drug addiction, and public disorder in cities like San Francisco.
Its central argument is that well‑intentioned (“compassionate”) policies have produced harmful unintended consequences, worsening the problems they aim to solve.

Main discussion points
1. The “progressive policy paradox”

• The book argues that cities with high spending and progressive policies still experience worsening homelessness and disorder.
• This creates a paradox where more funding does not lead to better outcomes.

2. Critique of “Housing First”

• “Housing First” = giving people housing without requiring sobriety or treatment
• Shellenberger argues this policy:
• Does not reduce addiction or improve health outcomes
• Diverts resources away from temporary shelters and transitional support
• Leads to fewer shelter beds and more people living on the streets

3. Decriminalization and “harm reduction”

• The book critiques policies such as:
• Decriminalizing drug use
• Distributing drug-use supplies
• Argument:
• These approaches can enable ongoing addiction rather than solve it
• They may contribute to open drug use and public disorder

4. The role of mental illness and addiction

• The book emphasizes that:
• A large share of homelessness is linked to serious mental illness and substance abuse
• It argues that policy frameworks often:
• Treat homelessness mainly as an economic or housing problem
• Underestimate the need for treatment and supervision

5. Deinstitutionalization legacy

• The book discusses the historical closure of mental hospitals (1960s–70s)
• Argument:
• Communities were not given adequate alternatives
• This contributed to visible street homelessness and untreated mental illness

6. Critique of “victim-centred” ideology

• Shellenberger describes a belief system where:
• Individuals are seen primarily as victims of structural forces
• Society avoids enforcing rules or consequences
• He argues this reduces accountability and weakens social order

7. Public space and urban decline

• The book highlights:
• Encampments
• Open drug scenes
• Crime and disorder in public spaces
• Argument:
• Policies that tolerate these conditions contribute to decline in quality of life and public health

8. Permissive vs. coercive approaches

• The book contrasts:
• Permissive policies (voluntary treatment, non-enforcement)
• More coercive models (mandatory treatment, structured housing)
• It argues that:
• More structured approaches may be more effective and ultimately more humane

9. Proposed solutions (broad direction)

• The author advocates for:
• Mandatory treatment programs for addiction and mental illness
• Expanded shelter capacity
• Stronger law enforcement on public disorder
• Integrated systems for mental health and addiction care

Important: Debate and criticism

• The book is highly controversial
• Critics argue that:
• Its analysis may oversimplify causes of homelessness
• Some claims are disputed by experts
• It can overlook structural factors like housing costs

Simple summary
Sanfransicko argues that:

• Good intentions (compassion-based policies)
• create unintended consequences

CUSTOMS:
You must register and be on the “Attendees - Going” list to attend.
Please bring $3 to cover Meetup costs.

RSVP POLICY:
RSVPs and cancellations will be accepted up until 6 hours before the start of the meetup so that people who feel unwell on the day have time to change their RSVP and allow someone else to attend.

Please only click 'attend' if you are going to come and remember to change your RSVP if you need to change plans.

No-shows will be removed from the group, i.e. being registered to attend and not attending will be considered a 'No Show'.
This RSVP policy has become necessary due to the high number of last-minute withdrawals and non-attendance. This unfairly causes people on the Waiting List to miss out. Thanks for your cooperation.