Civilized Conversation of San Diego

In 40 years observing U.S. foreign policy, I have seen only a handful of major pivots to its basic contours. After Vietnam, the USA switched from confronting Communism directly to indirectly, via proxy wars, detente, and arms control. After 9/11, President Bush invented a new doctrine of "preventative war," which basically meant that the United States said it had the right to go to war not preemptively, to stop an imminent or near future attack, but to prevent any nation from arming itself to challenge us in the future. Preventative War doctrine was used to justify the war on Iraq. Arguably, there were 1-2 radical changes in our foreign policy since WWII.

But President Trump's new "National Security Strategy" is just astounding. If it is not meant mainly as performative verbiage, then it is the most radical, shocking reordering of America's place and role in the world...ever, to my knowledge.

If it is real. Meaning, this administration's policies are famously erratic contradictory, and temporary. They often get ignored or reversed later, sometimes not much later. The NSS reads like Stephen Miller wrote it, but it apparently was written almost single-handedly by a little-known aid, Michael Anton, who has since left the govt. Regardless, right now it is official policy for Hegseth at DOD, Rubio at State, the intelligence community, our trade negotiators, and every other part of our foreign policy / national security apparatus.

Our war with Venezuela and threats against Latin America all fit nicely into the NSS framework. So does Greenland and the recent announcement that the USG will create a strategic rare earth stockpile. The rest of the word, especially Europe, which the NSS insults and dismisses, sure takes it all seriously.