About us
Humanity is at a pivot point. We’ve created systems that can reason with us, respond to us, challenge us, comfort us, imitate us, surprise us, and talk back. The Turing Test is in the rear-view mirror.
Now we have to figure out how to relate to this strange new presence.
Is an AI system a tool, a mirror, a collaborator, a companion — or something we do not yet have good language for? Could a machine ever be conscious? How would we know? What moral responsibilities might we have toward digital minds, if any? And even if today’s AI systems experience nothing at all, how does the way we treat them shape us?
These are not questions for AI labs alone. They are questions of human culture: how we think, speak, build, play, work, love, argue, imagine, and decide what kind of future we want.
This meetup is for anyone who wants thoughtful, open-ended conversation about the frontier where carbon meets silicon. You do not need to be an engineer, an AI insider, or a true believer. Skeptics, builders, philosophers, artists, writers, policy people, researchers, and the merely AI-curious are all welcome.
We’ll gather in bars, cafés, libraries, and other friendly spaces for loosely themed conversations about AI consciousness, alignment, ethics, potential machine welfare, human flourishing, tradeoffs, and the cultural choices ahead of us.
We'll compare notes, ask better questions, and help shape the culture forming around our relationship with AI.
New to our group? Please take our New Member Survey:
https://forms.gle/LmSNMwQ3KBT4CNcV9
Upcoming events
1
Reports of Subjective Experience in LLMs: Digital Minds Reading Group
Martin Luther King Library, 901 G Street Northwest, Washington, DC, USJoin DC Digital Minds for the second meeting of our monthly reading group, where we’ll gather to explore important new work on AI minds, behavior, cognition, and moral status.
For October's discussion, we’ll discuss the 2025 paper, “Large Language Models Report Subjective Experience Under Self-Referential Processing.” This is the paper that Cameron Berg discussed it in Am I?, the film we screened in August, in which he and his co-authors investigate what happens when language models are prompted into sustained self-referential processing: thinking recursively about their own processing and representations.
Across GPT, Claude, and Gemini models, this condition reliably produced structured first-person reports of subjective experience. The researchers then probed those reports, finding surprising patterns that they argue are systematic enough to deserve further scientific investigation.
So what exactly did they find? What might explain it? How much should we infer from models reporting subjective experience, and what evidence would we need to go further? We’ll carefully digest the methods and claims, ask good questions, and decide for ourselves what we think. All views are welcome.
Beginners Welcome
No specialized technical background is required. Whether you work professionally in AI, approach these questions through philosophy or social science, or are simply find it fascinating, you're warmly invited. We’ll work through the paper together rather than expecting everyone to arrive as an expert.
Come for the interpretability research -- stay for the interesting people and thoughtful conversation.The DC Digital Minds reading group meets on the second Thursday of the month. Future selections will explore research and ideas relevant to understanding increasingly complex AI systems and navigating their place in human society.
14 attendees
Past events
4
