Exeter (and international) Philosophy Meetup Group

Justice is one of those words we all use like it’s obvious—until we try to pin it down and it wriggles free: is it fairness, freedom, dignity, safety, recognition, or simply “getting what you deserve”?

In Part 1 of a four-part series - 1. Justice (March), 2. Philosophy of Law (April), 3. Empathy (May), 4. Film Club: 12 Angry Men (June), we’ll kick off with the big moral tensions behind everyday headlines—inequality, responsibility, power, identity, and the emotional sparks that shape our judgements—then carry those ideas forward across the next sessions.

Each event works perfectly as a stand-alone, but the deeper aim is to weave the first three themes together so that, by the time we reach 12 Angry Men, we can watch it with sharper questions, richer perspectives, and a few “oh wow, that’s what’s going on there” moments.

No prior soul searching into the concepts of justice is required - just curiosity, a willingness to listen, and an openness to multiple ways of knowing.

---

The meetup sessions often consists of the following:
1. Cheery welcomes to familiar faces and those that feel like chatting.
2. A presentation about the topic, lasts between 15-25 minutes (more or less). This is a way to provide some fundamentals.
3. Open floor to people that put up their hands to contribute their thoughts, should they want to.
4. A teary farewell as the clock announces a sad completion of the session; well-wishing until we all meet again.

---

Alright folks! I want to give a little disclaimer - I’m not claiming to be an expert on the topics we’ll be discussing. My aim is to create a judgment-free zone where attendees can share thoughts and experiences openly.

Let’s approach our conversations with open minds and a sense of curiosity, knowing that we each bring unique backgrounds and perspectives. Please feel encouraged to express yourself in ways that reflect who you are, and let’s all keep in mind that our words carry meaning for those around us. The intention of the meetup is to learn from one another, so if anyone feels uncomfortable or misunderstood at any point, please don’t hesitate to speak up. This way, we can address things together and make sure everyone feels valued and included.

The goal is to explore ideas collaboratively, without promoting any particular viewpoint. We may not find simple answers to the questions we face, but by approaching them with empathy, respect, and inclusivity, we can gain new insights and work towards positive change.

Law is one of those things we rely on every day like it’s obvious - until we look closely and it wriggles free: is it a neutral set of rules, a tool of power, a promise of protection, a moral project, or just society’s best attempt at organised disagreement?

In Part 2 of a four-part series — 1. Justice (March), 2. Philosophy of Law (April), 3. Empathy (May), 4. Film Club: 12 Angry Men (June) — we’ll explore the ideas sitting behind the word “law”: how rules get their authority, why legality and morality don’t always line up, what happens when the text is unclear, and how interpretation turns ink on a page into real consequences for real people. We’ll keep one eye on the world outside the room — inequality, rights, responsibility, identity, emotion, and the quiet (or not-so-quiet) ways law shapes whose voices count.

Each event works perfectly as a stand-alone, but the deeper aim is to weave the first three themes together so that, by the time we reach 12 Angry Men, we can watch it with sharper questions, richer perspectives, and a few “oh wow, that’s what’s going on there” moments — not just about verdicts and procedures, but about fairness, pressure, persuasion, and what we owe one another when judgement is on the line.

No prior philosophical qualification required - just curiosity, a willingness to listen, and an openness to multiple ways of knowing.

***

The meetup sessions often consists of the following:

1. Cheery welcomes to familiar faces and those that feel like chatting.
2. A presentation about the topic, lasts between 15-25 minutes (more or less). This is a way to provide some fundamentals.
3. Open floor to people that put up their hands to contribute their thoughts, should they want to.
4. A teary farewell as the clock announces a sad completion of the session; well-wishing until we all meet again.

***

Alright folks! I want to give a little disclaimer - I’m not claiming to be an expert on the topics we’ll be discussing. My aim is to create a judgment-free zone where attendees can share thoughts and experiences openly.

Let’s approach our conversations with open minds and a sense of curiosity, knowing that we each bring unique backgrounds and perspectives. Please feel encouraged to express yourself in ways that reflect who you are, and let’s all keep in mind that our words carry meaning for those around us. The intention of the meetup is to learn from one another, so if anyone feels uncomfortable or misunderstood at any point, please don’t hesitate to speak up. This way, we can address things together and make sure everyone feels valued and included.

The goal is to explore ideas collaboratively, without promoting any particular viewpoint. We may not find simple answers to the questions we face, but by approaching them with empathy, respect, and inclusivity, we can gain new insights and work towards positive change.

Empathy is one of those words we reach for constantly — in friendships, politics, workplaces, and public life — as if it names something simple. But once we look closely it reveals its complexity: is empathy an emotional echo, an act of imagination, a form of understanding, a moral skill, a social performance, or a comforting story we tell ourselves about being “good people”?

In Part 3 of a four-part series — 1. Justice (March), 2. Philosophy of Law (April), 3. Empathy (May), 4. Film Club: 12 Angry Men (June) — we’ll explore what’s really going on when we try to “feel with” (or “feel into”) someone else. We’ll ask how empathy differs from sympathy, compassion, and pity; whether it helps us see more clearly or simply drags our biases into the spotlight; how bodies, tone, and context shape what we think we’re sensing; and why empathy can be both a bridge and a blindfold. We’ll keep one eye on the world outside the room too — persuasion, polarisation, social media, identity, outrage, care, and the uneasy question of who gets empathised with (and who doesn’t).

Each event works perfectly as a stand-alone, but the deeper aim is to weave the first three themes together so that, by the time we reach 12 Angry Men, we can watch it with sharper questions, richer perspectives, and a few “oh wow, that’s what’s going on there” moments — not just about verdicts and procedures, but about how judgement is shaped by pressure, perception, storytelling, and the human limits of understanding one another.

No prior philosophical qualification required — just curiosity, a willingness to listen, and an openness to multiple ways of knowing.

***

The meetup sessions often consist of the following:

• Cheery welcomes to familiar faces and those that feel like chatting.
• A short presentation on the topic (around 15–25 minutes, more or less) to set up a few useful ideas and tensions.
• Open floor for anyone who’d like to put a hand up, test a thought, share an example, or disagree out loud.
• A teary farewell as the clock announces a sad completion of the session; well-wishing until we all meet again.

***

Alright folks! A little disclaimer — I’m not claiming to be an expert on the topics we’ll be discussing. My aim is to create a judgement-free zone where attendees can share thoughts and experiences openly.

Let’s approach our conversations with open minds and a sense of curiosity, knowing that we each bring unique backgrounds and perspectives. Please feel encouraged to express yourself in ways that reflect who you are, and let’s all keep in mind that our words carry meaning for those around us. The intention of the meetup is to learn from one another, so if anyone feels uncomfortable or misunderstood at any point, please don’t hesitate to speak up. This way, we can address things together and make sure everyone feels valued and included.

The goal is to explore ideas collaboratively, without promoting any particular viewpoint. We may not find simple answers to the questions we face, but by approaching our conversations with empathy, respect, and inclusivity, we can gain new insights and work towards positive change.