Fri, Aug 21 · 7:00 PM PDT
Nobody gets what they want all the time, but how often is the reason we aren't getting what we want due to our own behaviors and limitations vs. external factors we cannot control? While there are undoubtedly barriers we can't overcome, there are also times when our lack of progress or success is, as one might say, a "skill issue." Although it's typically meant as a joke, it's popular for people in some circles to direct focus to personal responsibility by declaring something is a skill issue.
Short temper? Emotional regulation skill issue.
Not many friends? Social skill issue.
Broke? Financial skill issue.
Trapped in the Matrix? Mindset skill issue.
It can be attractive to frame things in this way if you have a strong belief in agency and the power of the individual to overcome obstacles through effort, or conversely, could be considered derisive if you believe that a person's life is shaped by many circumstances they have no control over. What is truly possible and what is not?
Questions:
What is skill?
Is there a difference between skill and knowledge?
Is it possible to have a meta- skill issue? What does it mean to be skilled at developing skill?
Does somebody become greater - or lesser - through the way they relate to their skill issues?
Some philosophical and religious traditions regard desire as a force which can be controlled and redirected or vanquished; how might we be skillful with desire, and could having desire in itself be considered a "skill issue"?
How do you know if something is your own skill issue? How do you judge other people?
Do you use the same standards? Why?
Is it better to personally over-index or under-index on one's own control of one's situation? What about as a society?