Adult Fans of Lego

يوغا للرجال والنساء وخاصة بفئة المبتدئين .. استهدف فيها وضعيات او آساناز تخدم طاقة الجسم والمزاج والتوازن الشعوري

ندعوكم للانضمام إلى لقاء مناقشة كتاب يوسف أيها الصديق، حيث نلتقي في مساحة حوارية ملهمة لاستكشاف أعماق هذا العمل الأدبي وما يحمله من تأملات إنسانية ونفسية ثرية. سنناقش معًا أبرز الأفكار التي لامستنا، الرسائل التي تركت أثرًا، والاقتباسات التي تستحق التوقف عندها، مع تبادل وجهات النظر والانطباعات في أجواء ممتعة لعشاق القراءة. 🌿 سواء أنهيت الكتاب كاملًا أو قرأت جزءًا منه، حضورك سيضيف بعدًا مختلفًا للنقاش. 📍 انضم إلينا لتجربة ثقافية ثرية، ومساء مليء بالحوار..

Everyone is welcome to join us for playing chess or to learn how to play chess. 1 Chessboard & Clock will be available, kindly bring your own chessboard if you have one. For any questions you can contact me (WhatsApp +966540277042)

انضموا إلينا في اللقاء الثالث من مجلس الذكاء الاصطناعي، جلسة حوارية مفتوحة نستكشف فيها محورين رئيسيين: مسارات تعلم الذكاء الاصطناعي وكيف تبدأ رحلتك في هذا المجال، بالإضافة إلى مناقشة مستقبل البرمجة في ظل ثورة الذكاء الاصطناعي. ضيفنا م. مالك إبراهيم، حاصل على بكالوريوس في هندسة الإلكترونيات والاتصالات وماجستير في الذكاء الاصطناعي من جامعة الملك فهد للبترول والمعادن، سيشاركنا تجربته وخبرته بشكل عملي وواقعي. المكان: سايتك - الخبر 🗓 السبت 2 مايو 2026 ⏰ 8:00 مساءً ⚠️ المقاعد محدودة 🔗 للتسجيل: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdJ0nYVQpvXpobJKAoqcpXxjHhNbjiei7NTAfuQWBtrS3Ftvg/viewform?usp=publish-editor

A fun badminton event bringing Arabian people together to play, connect, and rise and shine as a community. To ensure the identity of the group and its Arab character, we would like to clarify that membership is open to holders of Arab nationalities only, and does not include non-Arab nationalities (such as Indian or Filipino), with full respect and appreciation for everyone.

يوغا للرجال والنساء وخاصة بفئة المبتدئين .. استهدف فيها وضعيات او آساناز تخدم طاقة الجسم والمزاج والتوازن الشعوري

ندعوكم للانضمام إلى لقاء مناقشة كتاب يوسف أيها الصديق، حيث نلتقي في مساحة حوارية ملهمة لاستكشاف أعماق هذا العمل الأدبي وما يحمله من تأملات إنسانية ونفسية ثرية. سنناقش معًا أبرز الأفكار التي لامستنا، الرسائل التي تركت أثرًا، والاقتباسات التي تستحق التوقف عندها، مع تبادل وجهات النظر والانطباعات في أجواء ممتعة لعشاق القراءة. 🌿 سواء أنهيت الكتاب كاملًا أو قرأت جزءًا منه، حضورك سيضيف بعدًا مختلفًا للنقاش. 📍 انضم إلينا لتجربة ثقافية ثرية، ومساء مليء بالحوار..

We’re bringing back Adult Field Day. Last year was a good mix of competition and just hanging out, so we’re doing it again with some new games mixed in. Think team-based challenges, simple races, and a few things inspired by game shows. You don’t need to be athletic. Most of the fun is just being part of a team and getting to know people you wouldn’t normally talk to. The goal isn’t really winning. It’s meeting people, laughing a bit, and leaving knowing a few more names than when you showed up. If you stick around after, we’ll have a potluck, a bonfire, and a couple comedians in the evening. Bring: * Please Bring Something to share for the potluck cookout signup sheet [https://www.signupgenius.com/go/10C0E49ABA92EA2FAC70-63781787-saturday](https://www.signupgenius.com/go/10C0E49ABA92EA2FAC70-63781787-saturday) * Clothes you can move around in RSVP on Meetup is free. A small contribution helps keep events sustainable and ensures those who RSVP actually show up. Great events take time, effort, and consistency to organize. Most people contribute $2–5 per event to help keep these going. Appreciate everyone who supports — it genuinely makes a difference. If you find value in these events or maybe even made a new friend, consider contributing what feels fair to you. **Contribution link** listed below in the comments

Join Neurospicy Columbus at the Stauff's for coffee and then a stroll through the Book Loft nearby! This will be a friendly chat for like minded individuals with Autism and/or ADHD (or somewhere on the Neurodiverse Spectra).

When judging morality, should we prioritize **intentions/duty** or **outcomes/results**? It introduces two influential philosophers as representatives of these approaches. * **Immanuel Kant (deontology):** An action is moral when it is done from **duty** and follows rational, universal principles (the **categorical imperative**). Certain acts—like lying—are wrong regardless of the consequences; you can’t do a wrong thing for a right reason. * **John Stuart Mill (utilitarian consequentialism):** The morality of an action is determined by its **effects**, specifically how much **happiness/well-being** it produces. Mill argues that some pleasures are “higher” than others, and that good intentions don’t redeem harmful outcomes. ## Discussion Questions 1. **The lying dilemma:** A murderer comes to your door and asks if your friend is hiding inside. Kant would say you must not lie. 2. **Can good intentions rescue a bad outcome?** 3. **The organ harvest problem:** A surgeon has five patients dying of organ failure and one healthy patient in for a checkup. Killing the one to harvest organs would save five lives, and the math works out for the utilitarian. Why does this feel so deeply wrong? Is that feeling a point in Kant's favor, or just a bias we should overcome? 4. **Do rules need exceptions?** Kant insists moral rules must be universal, with no exceptions. But most of us can imagine extreme scenarios where any rule seems like it should bend. Does the need for exceptions fatally undermine deontology, or is the strength of the system precisely that it refuses to bend? 5. **Who gets to calculate the consequences?** Utilitarianism asks us to maximize good outcomes, but we're notoriously bad at predicting consequences. If we can't reliably know the results of our actions, is it practical to base our entire moral system on outcomes? Does this uncertainty push us back toward rules and principles? 6. **Everyday morality:** Think about a real moral decision you've made recently, even a small one. Did you reason more like a Kantian (what's the right thing to do in principle?) or more like a utilitarian (what will produce the best result?)? Do most people naturally lean one way? 7. **Justice vs. the greater good:** A town can prevent a deadly plague by sacrificing one innocent person. The greater good is clearly served. But is it just? Can an action be morally right and deeply unjust at the same time? 8. **The big synthesis question:** Are these two systems actually opposed, or do they often arrive at the same answers by different paths? Is it possible that we need both: rules to guide us in the moment and consequences to evaluate systems and policies over time?